SBIR/STTR Research Award

Retroviral Vectors for Safe and Efficacious Gene Therapy

Award identifier 82bfa875031ceec0336ccbad9f9ecbab2293a65d74304aa1eb9077bcc794186dAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$1,002,080

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Neumedicines Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2006-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Phase I funding for this project supported the successful development of the backbone for a new generation of retroviral gene therapy vectors that contain safety and efficacy features designed to overcome the problems that have been found with retroviral vectors used in current clinical trials. The model disease targeted is the well-studied genetic disease Adenosine Deaminase Deficient Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (ADA-SCID). Phase I work has produced a vector backbone with all viral regulatory sequences involved in gene expression removed and replaced with tissue-specific human (or eukaryotic) regulatory sequences. Specifically the vector has the authentic human ADA Locus Control Region (LCR) and the human ADA promoter in a Self-Inactivating (SIN) backbone, together with additional sequences to improve safety and stability. The vector has a high titer and was shown to express GFP in a tissue-specific (i.e., specific for T cells) manner that suggests that the ADA LCR and ADA promoter are functioning properly. The goal of Phase II is to use the vector backbone developed in Phase I to construct clinically useful, commercially viable gene therapy vectors that can be utilized in clinical trials. The safety and efficacy features being developed can be incorporated into any retroviral vectors and therefore are of broad utility. The hypothesis on which this work is based is the following: Retroviral vectors can be made safer and more efficacious by deleting viral c/s-regulatory sequences and replacing them with human (or other eukaryotic) regulatory sequences. We hypothesize that by removing the enhancer/promoter in the 3' LTR (i.e., using a SIN backbone), inserting a human LCR together with its natural endogenous promoter, and providing insulator sequences, the potential for regulated, tissue-specific, physiological gene expression would be greatly increased while the potential for activation of downstream oncogenes would be greatly decreased. Insertion of a suicide gene translated from an IRES would provide an additional safety feature. Retroviral vectors built using these principles would increase the efficacy and safety of gene therapy vectors to be used in clinical trials. Commercialization Aspects: The achievement of the goals outlined in this Phase II proposal will provide a series of superior retroviral gene therapy vector that will be highly suitable for human gene therapy clinical trials. To commercialize these vectors, Neumedicines plans to partner with companies who are specifically targeting gene-based diseases. Such licensing arrangements will provide for use of these vectors by our partners in a field-exclusive manner, and consequently, will provide a critical step in bringing the technology to its marketable fruition.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.