SBIR/STTR Research Award

Resuscitation--impedance threshold devices in pediatrics

Award identifier d1e10972969378f5e2f3fe5c2b57380e0bd379d641f56ac58dd41a5dadda6b0eAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$317,675

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
ADVANCED CIRCULATORY SYSTEMS, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2006-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Traumatic injury and hypovolemic shock are leading causes of death in children worldwide. Rapid, large volume crystalloid infusion and positive intrathoracic pressure ventilation resuscitation strategies often increase morbidity and mortality following hemorrhage. Augmenting negative intrathoracic pressure, even without fluid resuscitation, improves hemodynamic parameters and outcome in adult porcine hemorrhagic shock. Vascular biology, physiology, and tissue injury mechanisms change as the child matures from infancy through adolescence, and are distinctly different from adults. The optimal method to restore intravascular volume, prevent secondary organ damage, and prevent progression of reversible shock to irreversible circulatory collapse following severe blood loss in children is not known. Our central hypothesis is that breathing through an impedance threshold device (ITD) or, in apneic patients, use of the intrathoracic pressure regulator (ITPR), enhances negative intrathoracic pressure and thus will augment preload, improve cardiac output, enhance cerebral oxygenation, and delay or prevent the progression of reversible shock to irreversible circulatory collapse for infants and children. The goal of this proposal is to demonstrate the proof of concept of a novel resuscitative strategy for hypovolemic shock in pediatrics that improves outcomes. The strategy involves the use of an impedance threshold device (ITD) in spontaneously breathing infants and children and the intrathoracic pressure regulator (ITPR) in patients requiring assisted ventilation. Both lower intrathoracic pressures and thereby enhance venous return and cardiac output while simultaneously lowering intracranial pressures. This phase 1 investigation proposes to: 1) determine the optimal ITD "cracking pressure" in a pediatric model of hemorrhagic shock, 2) demonstrate proof of concept of the impedance threshold valve in pediatric swine by evaluating the device in an established pediatric porcine model of hemorrhagic shock for its ability to: a) improve hemodynamics, and b) increase the 24-hour survival rate, and 3) demonstrate proof of concept of the intrathoracic pressure regulator (ITPR) in ventilator dependent pediatric swine by evaluating the prototype in an established piglet model of hemorrhagic shock for its ability to: a) improve hemodynamics, b) increase the 24-hour survival rate, and c) be used without adverse events, specifically the occurrence of atelectasis. An optimal ITD and ITPR resuscitation strategy has a great potential to successfully combat hypovolemic shock and circulatory collapse, the most common cause of morbidity and mortality in children worldwide.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.