SBIR/STTR Research Award

Nondestructive Beam Diagnostic Using Diffraction Radiation

Award identifier 5312d327e5a306029e570f1703cdc3d027db831b7dccf8f1bb4f4a0bf27fab53Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$75,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

1998

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
STI OPTRONICS, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
KP6VEC6HAVZ7
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

50199-98-I Nondestructive Beam Diagnostic Using Diffraction Radiation--STI Optronics, Inc., 2755 Northup Way, Bellvue, WA 98004-1403; (425) 827-0460 Dr. Wayne D. Kimura, Principal Investigator Dr. Kem E. Robinson, Business Official DOE Grant No. DE-FG03-98ER82673 Amount: $75,000 Advanced nondestructive beam diagnostics are needed which are capable of measuring and monitoring, in real-time, critical accelerator beam parameters such as divergence, profile, emittance, and bunch length. These diagnostics should also be compatible with automatic accelerator tuning and computer control. Accelerators, such as the 4-GeV Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, cannot use destructive diagnostics under continuous operation. However, conventional nondestructive diagnostics cannot easily provide all the beam information required. This project will develop a new diagnostic technique based upon diffraction radiation (DR), which is capable of measuring, in real-time and simultaneously, the beam transverse (spatial) distribution, longitudinal (temporal) distribution, divergence, emittance, and energy in a nondestructive manner. The design will be inherently compact and will be easily interfaced with computer control systems. The primary objectives of Phase I are to perform additional analysis to optimize the configuration, develop DR codes from existing transition radiation codes, and develop baseline designs for DR diagnostics. Prototype DR diagnostics will be constructed and tested during Phase II. These prototypes will then form the basis for commercial products, which would be customized depending on the end user¿s requirements. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits as described by the awardee: These diagnostics can be used on leptonhadron and ion accelerators and with moderate to high energy and low to high current beams. Because these diagnostic techniques will be nondestructive and compact in size, accelerator operators and users can use them to characterize the beam at multiple locations along the beamline and within their experiments. The beam information provided can be used for automated computer control of the accelerator. Commercial customers would include government, academic, medical, and industrial facilities._

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

27 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1993–2021). Reported award amounts total $8,008,167. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Agriculture, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.