SBIR/STTR Research Award

Wireless Cardiorespiratory Monitor for Neonates

Award identifier 14492d14c8d7c4aaab5b13f848c74806840c57b67443687bcbab8445de6f6d29Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$1,512,200

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Pgs Med Research & Electronic Design,LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2010-2
Topic code
NICHD

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): With improvements in neonatal and reproductive medicine, greater numbers of premature neonates are surviving that require hospital and home cardiorespiratory monitoring. Investigators have developed a method for acquiring an infant's heart rate at the abdomen and back without the use of electrodes. This new method has been combined with a previously developed FDA 510K cleared wireless respiratory rate sensor. Both sensors have been integrated into a single belt, worn at the abdomen, and transmit cardiorespiratory data wirelessly to a bedside monitor. NIH Phase II development was followed by clinical trials in a clinical setting at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at Children's National Medical Center and Yale University Children's hospital for reliability, safety, and general acceptability. This low cost, electrodeless, and wireless design could 1) replace aging monitoring equipment at Level I/II care nurseries, in the home, and in neonatal transport equipment at dramatically reduced costs; 2) introduce cardiorespiratory monitoring into areas of neonatal care where it was previously cost prohibitive; 3) improve ease and comfort by which infants, parents, and caregivers interact; and 4) improve compliance in the in home setting as well as reduce incidence of false alarms due to elimination of shifting electrodes. Continuing objectives of this competing grant are to obtain FDA 510K clearance on the combined wireless monitor by multicenter clinical studies and to IP enable the wireless monitor so as to seamlessly monitor patients remotely on secure Web sites. The final form factor and user interface will also be designed and optimized. The wireless and disposable features of this technology define this as a value-added product that should appeal to innovative companies desirous of increased sales, market share and profitability while simultaneously lowering health care costs via offering inexpensive, easy to use non- invasive infant monitoring. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Providing a low-cost wireless cardio respiratory monitor that uses no electrodes such as the one proposed could have far reaching effects in the overall delivery of health care quality and cost when monitoring infants in the NICU as well as step down, lower level care units and in home monitoring settings. The ease of application and lack of wires will increase compliance with in home monitoring protocols as well as allow for better bonding of parents in and out of hospital settings.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.