SBIR/STTR Research Award

Non-Contact Magneto-Optical Analyzer for IR Focal Plane Array Materials

Award identifier 63cfbbf494e9c021fa8e2df25d2b3093f041f955b6f2a95bb74c1300fa279e40Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$731,157

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

1996

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
MORGAN RESEARCH CORP.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
TRKEP1HEBNS5
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Focal plane arrays (FPAs) are one of the most critical and expensive components in infrared imaging equipment, such as nigh vision, security and surveillance systems. In the device manufacturing processes, at present, it is not possible to determine if the final product is successful until all steps and materials have been incorporated. Since this entire manufacturing process can take up to 12 weeks to complete, much time and effort is spent on components which may ultimately prove to be defective. Current defect rates are in the order of 80% and are attributed to defective FPA chips/die. As a consequence, the availability of fully functional FPA modules is limited, and the price of those produced is unacceptably high. The Hall effect technique, particularly in conjunction with the van der Pauw theorem, is the most frequently used method of screening chips. In this technique at least four electrical ohmic contacts must be made to the semiconductor. This technique is labor intensive and frequently causes mechanical and electrical problems that result in inaccurate and non-repeatable results or damage. Furthermore, the measurement of carrier concentration as a function of position on the slice (mapping) is impossible since the Hall technique provides only the average value of the carrier concentration for area enclosed by the electrical contacts. For detector arrays, carrier concentration uniformity or doping homogeneity is necessary for uniform array operations. Any nonuniformity in the starting material would show up as a nonuniformity in the detectivity of each pixel in the detector array. The approach described in this proposal requires no physical contacts, is not labor intensive and can map electronic properties, such as carrier concentration and mobility, of a chip with high spatial resolution thereby identifying small areas of electronic nonuniformity that could not otherwise be found by conventional screening methods. This is accomplished by utilizing the Faraday rotation effect.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

37 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1991–2006). Reported award amounts total $9,015,176. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation

Contractor profile

CGI FEDERAL INC.

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 518210

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.