SBIR/STTR Research Award

Diagnostic Viability of Umbilical Cord Specimens

Award identifier 85e06d90e57fbb6b3287f1d7c457b69463325a86251d304f95c4e3ffe54e63b6Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$680,428

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
UNITED STATE DRUG TESTING LABORATORIES, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
XJGQSD827RC5
Solicitation number
PHS2006-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The current "best practices" procedure for diagnosing the in utero drug exposure of fetuses is testing the newborn's meconium for the presence of drugs. Meconium is difficult to collect and in 8-20% of births in the U.S. the meconium is released into the amniotic fluid pre-birth due to some type of fetal distress. While drugs may have induced this fetal distress it is unlikely that these infants will be tested for drug exposure due to lack of available meconium for testing. Under Phase I funding we studied the feasibility of substituting umbilical cord for meconium in fetal drug testing. Umbilical cord is readily available at every birth event and is easily collected. During the Phase I study we screened 118 matched meconium/umbilical cord samples with immunoassays specific for amphetamines, opiates, cocaine metabolites, cannabinoids, and phencyclidine (PCP) (NIDA-5 panel). The meconium samples were tested and reported out as routine clinical samples. Umbilical cord extracts were prepared, screened for the same drugs, and the results compared to the screening data for the respective meconium samples. Cutoffs for the umbilical cord screening tests were determined by ROC analyses of the data. Agreement between meconium and umbilical cord for amphetamine screening was 96.6%; for opiates was 94.9%; for cocaine metabolites was 99.2%; for cannabinoids was 90.7%; and for PCP was 100% for negatives (no PCP positive samples were obtained). Having established feasibility of umbilical cord testing in these Phase I studies, we now propose to extend these studies in Phase II to optimize and develop for production testing the umbilical cord extraction and assay procedures. We will screen by drug group-specific immunoassays and analyze by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), the gold standard in drug testing, a large sampling (1000) of umbilical cord specimens from potentially drug- exposed neonates obtained from various socio-economic and ethnic populations at several birthing sites in the U.S. The data obtained will be used to establish drug screening cutoffs having optimum sensitivity and specificity. The umbilical cord screening and gold standard GC/MS assays will be validated and a marketing plan will be developed to introduce these assays into the drug testing arena. Testing of umbilical cord specimens will simplify drug testing of newborns, will allow testing of those infants suffering fetal distress, and will provide the potential to intervene for a greater population of drug-exposed babies.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

11 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1997–2021). Reported award amounts total $3,761,843. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.