SBIR/STTR Research Award

Carbon Foam-Based Lightweight Mirrors

Award identifier 665fa8b672b00c8c6957e8dbc544ea0b60d8ac317fa3a09be51e1467d0331ab5Awarding agency Department of Defense · Missile Defense Agency

Award amount

$1,723,576

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Missile Defense Agency
Recipient company
TOUCHSTONE RESEARCH LABORATORY, LTD.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
FBK3WT3XQVH8
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Several current and upcoming space-based telescope and laser beam director designs, such as the Next-Generation Space Telescope (NGST) and the Airborne Laser (ABL), call for lightweight, high-stiffness optical components. Using conventionalmirror/director technologies, the cost and weight of these systems would be prohibitive. In addition, conventional materials, such as glass, offer insufficient stiffness, and their performance is adversely affected by vibration and thermal serviceconditions. The use of coal-based carbon foam as a structural and support material is proposed. The coal-based foam can be tailored with regard to stiffness and thermal expansion and can be graded in density and pore structure through its thickness toprovide localized stiffness and thermal expansion control while maintaining an overall weight-efficient structure. Carbon foams' unique combination of properties can provide the properties of high stiffness, light weight and low thermal expansion requiredfor mirror/directors as well as mounts, optical benches and support structures. Precursor selection and blending will be studied to optimize foam characteristics while processing parameters and alternate processing methods will be investigated. Productuniformity and manufacturing times and cost will be evaluated as prototype applications are developed and qualified. Carbon, when graphitic and highly ordered as in fiber or deposited film forms, can exhibit unmatched stiffness and thermal stability (e.g., near-zero thermal expansion). Carbon foams can provide similar performance to woven or knitted carbon fiber formsat a fraction of the cost and with significantly greater design/use flexibility. Optical systems based on these foams can be designed in terms of stiffness, thermal expansion, and density - even on localized scales. Demonstration that foam composites canbe used in space-based optical systems - controlling structure stiffness and thermal expansion and surviving exposure to launch conditions, thermal cycling, vibration, and high-temperature oxidation - will aid in carbon foam insertion into otherspace-based and/or optical structures. These include: mirrors and directors, optical benches, reaction structures, reinforcement for large-area structures, and thermal protection systems.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

104 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1998–2025). Reported award amounts total $38,514,559. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.