SBIR/STTR Research Award

Highly Efficient Removal of Mercury From Industrial Flue Gas

Award identifier eb99a766fb45321f4461845441565d22146ec743e0b3d5d1c62cd9bae414bdc7Awarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$70,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2004

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Frontier Geosciences Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
TKXSRGGCA2W6
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

It is estimated that 144-189 megagrams (158-207 tons) of mercury are emitted annually into the atmosphere by anthropogenic sources in the United States. Approximately 87 percent of the mercury is from combustion point sources and 10 percent is from manufacturing point sources. The combustion point sources can be broken down further into four classes: (1) coal-fired utility boilers, (2) municipal waste combustion, (3) commercial/industrial boilers, and (4) medical waste incinerators. It is not economically feasible to remove the trace mercury before it enters the process; the easiest location for mercury capture is the flue gas discharges. Wet scrubbing is used in 20-30 percent of U.S. coal-fired plants. In most cases, the systems are designed mainly for solid particle or SOx removal. As a serendipitous side benefit, organic and inorganic materials that easily dissolve in water, such as HgCl2, also are removed from the flue gas. However, a large fraction of the mercury in the flue gas is elemental mercury (Hg0), which is not fully removed by a simple wet scrubbing system and is expelled into the environment. The goal of this Phase I research project is to develop a technology that can remove all forms of mercury from flue gases, allowing the ¿trapped¿ Hg to be easily separated from the scrubber water in a form that passes all required Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) protocols and be easily adapted to existing plant equipment, reducing capital and implementation costs. Frontier Geosciences, Inc., has discovered a method in which the scrubber water is chemically modified to remove and complex Hg, no matter what form, from industrial flue gases. It is proposed that Hg is extracted into the scrubber water using an inert solid chemical modifier. Once in solution, the Hg is complexed and precipitated by an organic binding agent. The intended organic binding agent has been shown to complex Hg greater than 99.9999 percent in aqueous solution, and the resulting precipitate passes TCLP testing. The combined waste solids then can be removed by an industry standard filter system and the scrubber water immediately recycled back into the treatment system. This will minimize water consumption and possibly allow the regeneration of the inert solid chemical modifier with minimal equipment modification.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

11 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2000–2007). Reported award amounts total $914,859. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.