SBIR/STTR Research Award

A 350 GHz, 0.25 MW Robust Gyrotron Optimized for High Volume Production for Net Electric Fusion Reactors

Award identifier 7e6566234fd5f3005b9193767b2d2bea717149e3fdfc9432615bc50dd6910912Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$199,926

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
BRIDGE 12 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Proposal award date
2025-02-18
Contract end date
2025-11-17
UEI
KU5VWM3D5TJ8
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0003417
Topic code
C59-22a

Research abstract

As work continues on the design and fabrication of ITER experimental fusion reactor there is new focus on the next generation commercial fusion reactors. Several design concepts have been put forward including the DEMOnstration power station followed by the PROTOtype power station and other concepts for compact reactors. Electron Cyclotron Resonance Heating (ECRH) and Electron Cyclotron Current Drive (ECCD) will be vital tools in all these reactors both for plasma control and heating. Based on the preliminary designs most of these reactors will require 20 – 40 MW of power in the 250 – 350 GHz range (depending on chosen magnetic field) for ECRH and ECCD. We propose the development of a 350 GHz, 0.25 MW gyrotron as a robust, reliable and economical alternative to a 1 MW system at 350 GHz. The development of a reliable product that can be mass produced will eventually pave the way for an overall cost reduction of the EC system. While we have not performed a complete trade-off analysist to accurately determine if a 0.3 MW or a 0.25 MW would be optimal from a production point, a 1 MW device at 350 GHz would be prohibitively expensive just considering a 220 mm bore, 15 T superconducting magnet. Though the initial cost of four 0.25 MW units will likely be ~1.5 times the cost of a single 1 MW unit, the increase in reliability, and lower repair cost per tube will eventually lead to a lower total ownership cost. We propose to fabricate key parts of the gyrotron using Additive Manufacturing to reduce the time and cost of part fabrication achieved by minimizing the number of joints and other machining operations. The proposed system will advance the state of the art significantly and pave the way for successful adoption of such compact systems in commercial reactors. This successful demonstration of the key physics and engineering aspects will pave the way for the fabrication and testing of a continuous wave device with funding support from a sponsor. Summary for members of Congress: Bridge 12 Technologies proposes to develop a high frequency gyrotron (microwave generator) for heating nuclear fuel in a fusion reactor for clean energy production.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

38 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2010–2025). Reported award amounts total $18,895,835. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, Department of Defense, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.