SBIR/STTR Research Award

Synthetic Terrain Generation Employing Wavelet Based Multi-Resolution Polygon Meshes

Award identifier f763a718148d438cf79498df117468eddf17eb1bf57ebc2f9d0988ffd87fff8fAwarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$69,998

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
Physical Optics Corporation
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
DG3AB4E8R4D8
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

The U.S. Navy needs systems that generate highly realistic, fully and partially synthetic terrain data for training, simulation, and the evaluation of various terrain sensors. Synthetic terrain data is required to simulate areas for which high-resolutiondata cannot be extracted for political or practical reasons. This system must be able to export the information in a variety of standard formats, including SEDRIS and SDTS. In response to this need, Physical Optics Corporation (POC) proposes to develop anew Fractal Extrapolation Wavelet Synthetic Terrain Application Recursive (FEW-STAR) system. FEW-STAR will employ wavelet-based, polygon-mesh, surface representations coupled with a database containing the statistics of similar terrain types to add detailvia wavelet interpolation that incorporates appropriately tailored random functions providing the detail coefficients. FEW-STAR will repeat this process recursively for each resolution level. Rivers and other large-scale natural and man-made structureswill be added to the map by a global monitoring module that controls overall connectivity and orientation of features. This module will be augmented by an expert system that employs fuzzy logic to place discrete foliage and man-made artifacts. In PhaseI, these tools will be integrated into a prototype that facilitates the interactive specification of the desired terrain. The generation of realistic high-resolution terrain data is increasingly essential for the fields of simulation, computer generatedimagery, and electronic games. The capacity of the proposed FEW-STARS to generate arbitrarily detailed terrain in a semi-autonomous manner or add synthetic detail to existing data will be of immense utility to interactive game development and computergenerated graphics for film and high-definition television. Additional commercial applications include videography, remote sensing, mapping, and GIS.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

1,933 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1986–2021). Reported award amounts total $549,686,800. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Homeland Security

Contractor profile

PHYSICAL OPTICS CORPORATION

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.