SBIR/STTR Research Award

Propulsion and Propeller Technology for High Altitude Airships (HAA)

Award identifier 66892d40d115071ef2e79d484d60d76ba3d785706e93c05c660209450ef1cb4cAwarding agency Department of Defense · Missile Defense Agency

Award amount

$70,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Missile Defense Agency
Recipient company
TRITON SYSTEMS, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
DA91DUWSMSQ7
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Triton Systems, proposes to develop investment cast continuous fiber reinforced aluminum (FRA) materials for an advanced very large, very lightweight high altitude airship propeller. A lightweight, advanced hybrid propeller will be developed that combinesa fiber reinforced aluminum spar with polymer composites. This will eliminate the heavy, large diameter bond joint currently required at the retention end of composite propeller blades. The proposed propeller material will significantly reduce the drag onthe inboard end of the propeller by reducing the frontal area of the chord in this area. The investment cast FRA spar enables efficient load transfer from the FRA inboard end to the PMC outboard end of the propeller. Additionally, the reduced crosssectional area at the propeller root allows thinner propeller blades, increasing aerodynamic propeller efficiency, reduces weight, reduces drag, and opens the design space for the specialized propeller that will be required in the low Reynolds numberregime found at 70,000 feet. Triton Systems, Inc. is teamed with a major manufacturer of composite propeller blades, who will provide technical assistance on the propeller design, the resin systems used, and compatibility with their current processes.The proposed development effort will enable a light propeller with increased aerodynamic efficiency. There exists a significant market for lightweight propellers in both the military and commercial sectors. In the High Altitude Airship application thematerials proposed provide the benefit of lightweight, and increased design flexibility. In larger propellers, with significantly more powerful engines at lower altitudes, the narrowing of the propeller root significantly increases the available air forthe engine and will dramatically improve the thrust to weight ratio for the engine, improving the performance for the entire aircraft. The low-cost production of fiber-reinforced aluminum is applicable to virtually any moving vehicle, and potentially tostructures of large buildings. Military programs such as the Army's Future Combat Systems and the Navy's DDX program are prime areas of DoD application.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

927 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1993–2026). Reported award amounts total $388,500,403. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Transportation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.