SBIR/STTR Research Award

Novel Therapeutic for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD)

Award identifier 902e648c749102e3873943c29beef56b4d4b2ec90ef9947c2a195da4f17f2c73Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$200,506

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2009

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Angion Biomedica Corp.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
FCRJS1FGND63
Solicitation number
PHS2009-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): A significant body of literature indicates that Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF) via potent and direct anti-fibrotic activity protects many organs from the fibrosis-driven pathology. In addition, HGF has been shown to also promote muscle progenitor cells to proliferate to promote the regenerative capacity of the muscle in response to injury or significant work load. Potentially Refanalin could recapitulate both activities of HGF and promote more efficient repair and prevent fibrosis in the setting of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. We have evaluated Refanalin in several models of tissue fibrosis including, lung and liver fibrosis, and in preclinical models of ischemic stroke, hepatic, renal, pulmonary and myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury including models of liver, kidney and lung transplantation. Treatment with Refanalin was associated with reduced mortality, improved organ function and preservation of tissue architecture. These efficacy data (some presented here) coupled with an excellent safety profile and ideal drugability, makes Refanalin an ideal candidate for evaluation in DMD. We are in a unique position, to test our first in class, small molecule HGF mimetic, in the setting of muscular dystrophy where the gold standard of treatment remains only the corticosteroids, which have dose- limiting potentially severe side effects. Refanalin, has been dosed in man; phase I dose-escalation safety and pK studies having been completed in healthy volunteers, and it currently being evaluated in a phase IIa pK, safety study in dialysis patients with the intent to enter larger scale phase IIb efficacy studies in kidney patients by first quarter 2009. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Our lead molecule, Refanalin, which has advanced to clinical trial in kidney patients, is a small molecule-HGF mimetic. Extensive studies in the laboratory have shown that Refanalin will exert potent anti-fibrotic effects in many disease settings. These results in conjunction with the possibility that Refanalin will mimic HGF and promote satellite cell activation- potential improving on muscle regeneration, makes Refanalin an attractive possible therapy for the severely debilitating disease of young boys, Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

75 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1999–2019). Reported award amounts total $60,879,018. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.