SBIR/STTR Research Award

Toward robust HDF5

Award identifier 879b4bca062f0012680dd61c79b3a732188bcf843ebfa430b13154d3f1dfab50Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$200,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
LIFEBOAT LLC
Proposal award date
2025-02-18
Contract end date
2025-11-17
UEI
MBP7P41EJNK6
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0003417
Topic code
C59-01a

Research abstract

A scientific binary data format and the I/O library have become the de-facto standard for managing large and complex data throughout the data lifecycle, from data acquisition to data archiving. While the format offers efficient storage and access to data, it comes with a major shortcoming: data may be lost if a file written according to the format by the I/O library becomes corrupted. Data corruption may occur when an application terminates due to internal error or system crash, or when an application is accidentally killed by a user. Another common data corruption scenario happens when a file is accessed in a way that is not supported by the I/O library, for example, two or more processes and/or threads modify the file at the same time. While in some cases the problem can be solved by re-running the application and regenerating the data, this may not be a solution for applications that run for a long time, or for data acquisition applications. When such a catastrophic event occurs, a binary file is often left in an inconsistent state due to missing pieces of internal metadata or corrupted metadata making it unreadable by the I/O library. With corrupted metadata it becomes impossible to recover any data stored in the binary file. Providing a solution for the data corruption problem is one of the long-awaited features by the users of the binary data format and the I/O library. The project will leverage existing architecture and functionality of the I/O library and implement coarse metadata journaling by saving snapshots of metadata on a filesystem of users’ choice. Those snapshots always represent a consistent state of metadata and can be used by a tool to restore the corrupted file. As a by-product of this work, the project will deliver an enhanced data streaming capability and a plugin mechanism for custom I/O drivers. In Phase I of the project, we will design and prototype the necessary changes to the I/O library and the data recovery tool. The software prototyped in Phase I and refined in Phase II will: Improve robustness of the I/O library and offer an operational mode that minimizes loss of data in event of application crash, Provide a recovery tool to restore corrupted data, Have an enhanced data streaming capability and a plugin mechanism for custom I/O drivers.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

8 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2022–2025). Reported award amounts total $4,949,411. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.