SBIR/STTR Research Award

Preventing Reverse Engineering with a Random Obfuscating Compiler (ROC)

Award identifier 407d5f98832ea84beb0c6ebaadb1a2b2a855659299e6a2523ae0bb21be3a2483Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$99,919

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
ANGEL SECURE NETWORKS, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

We propose to build a Random Obfuscating Compiler (ROC), a tool and a process for systematic research and testing of strategies for protecting software from reverse engineering using differential analysis. The US is at war. Our enemies will strive toreverse engineer valuable legacy software ,in order to eliminate US strategic technological advantages, and sabotage critical system performance. We think the ROC is feasible now. Our investigators, Fred Smith, PI, and Benjamin Smith are experienceddevelopers who have already produced somewhat similar software. They have been developing cyber security technologies which are crucial to countering reverse engineering for the past six years. Fred Smith has expertise in assembler, which is required tomanipulate compiled executables and provides unique strategies for defeating differential analysis. The ROC will obfuscate executables and libraries given only the information in the binaries themselves. This technique can be inexpensively and rapidlyapplied to a large body of legacy software. The ROC will test strategies for detecting debuggers, disassemblers, falsified operating environments, protecting files and memory and obfuscating executables. ROC test results, a UML documented design, and aPhase I prototype will provide a basis for Phase II research on an integrated secure software processing system. The anticipated benefits for DoD are:¿ Test results comparing efficacy of various reverse engineering strategies¿ Testing of strategies for countering differential analysis of software applicaionts;¿ At least one method of rapidly and inexpensively protecting legacy software from reverse engineering by obfuscating executables¿ Development of techniques to detect hostile reverse engineering applications such as debuggers and disassemblers¿ A method for automatically obfuscating executables, libraries, and other binaries¿ Development of techniques to detect hostile reverse engineering applications such as debuggers and disassemblers¿ Multiple, overlapping layers of security for critical software applications¿ Defense against reverse engineering techniques that we think are presently only theoretical but are feasible¿ Defeat side channel attacks¿ Methods of authenticating network nodes used for HPC computing¿ Capacity to prevent reverse engineering of an obfuscated executable¿ Development of random confusion technologyPotential commercial applications include:¿ Army, Navy, and Air Force, all of which are developing new combat information systems which require protection from reverse engineering¿ NASA¿ A ROC for securities firms and banks which have an obligation to protect client information from disclosure and lots of legacy software they would like to protect without rewriting¿ A ROC for software companies to use against industrial espionage

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.