SBIR/STTR Research Award

WELDING TECHNOLOGY

Award identifier d380773500faa4907ec009936636b0f989c5ddee668bec13694c18a6ecb6567dAwarding agency National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Award amount

$50,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

1991

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Mid-south Engineering, Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

THIS PROJECT IS DEVELOPING METHODS TO USE ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS FOR MODELING AND CONTROL OF ARC-WELDING PROCESSES. ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS WILL BE COMPARED WITH MORE TRADITIONAL MODELS, SUCH AS THOSE DERIVED FROM THE PHYSICS OF HEAT CONDUCTION, AND TECHNIQUES FOR COMBINING THE USE OF BOTH IN MODELING AND CONTROL WILL BE EXPLORED. ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS ARE ADVANTAGEOUS IN THAT ESSENTIALLY NO EXPLICIT MODEL DERIVATION OF THE PROCESS IS NECESSARY. RATHER, NEURAL NETWORKS ARE TRAINED WITH REAL WELDING DATA FROM THE PROCESS TO BE MODELED, AND THEY ADAPT THEMSELVES AUTONOMOUSLY TO "LEARN" OR CAPTURE THE GENERAL PROCESS CHARACTERISTICS. IT HAS BEEN SHOWN THAT NEURAL-NETWORK MODELS ARE GENERALLY NUMERICALLY MORE ACCURATE AND USUALLY FASTER IN EXECUTION THAN MOST OF THEIR TRADITIONAL, PHYSICALLY BASED COUNTERPARTS. TYPICAL ACCURACY IN PREDICTING GEOMETRICAL FEATURES OF WELDS IS ON THE ORDER OF 10 PERCENT OR BETTER. PHYSICALLY BASED MODELS, ON THE OTHERHAND, PROVIDE INTUITIVE INSIGHT INTO THE PROCESSES, AND THEYWILL BE USED HERE FOR GUIDING AND CHECKING THE OVERALL VALIDITY OF THE NEURAL-NETWORK SOLUTIONS. THIS PROJECT IS DEVELOPING METHODS TO USE ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS FOR MODELING AND CONTROL OF ARC-WELDING PROCESSES. ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS WILL BE COMPARED WITH MORE TRADITIONAL MODELS, SUCH AS THOSE DERIVED FROM THE PHYSICS OF HEAT CONDUCTION, AND TECHNIQUES FOR COMBINING THE USE OF BOTH IN MODELING AND CONTROL WILL BE EXPLORED. ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS ARE ADVANTAGEOUS IN THAT ESSENTIALLY NO EXPLICIT MODEL DERIVATION OF THE PROCESS IS NECESSARY. RATHER, NEURAL NETWORKS ARE TRAINED WITH REAL WELDING DATA FROM THE PROCESS TO BE MODELED, AND THEY ADAPT THEMSELVES AUTONOMOUSLY TO "LEARN" OR CAPTURE THE GENERAL PROCESS CHARACTERISTICS. IT HAS BEEN SHOWN THAT NEURAL-NETWORK MODELS ARE GENERALLY NUMERICALLY MORE ACCURATE AND USUALLY FASTER IN EXECUTION THAN MOST OF THEIR TRADITIONAL, PHYSICALLY BASED COUNTERPARTS. TYPICAL ACCURACY IN PREDICTING GEOMETRICAL FEATURES OF WELDS IS ON THE ORDER OF 10 PERCENT OR BETTER. PHYSICALLY BASED MODELS, ON THE OTHERHAND, PROVIDE INTUITIVE INSIGHT INTO THE PROCESSES, AND THEYWILL BE USED HERE FOR GUIDING AND CHECKING THE OVERALL VALIDITY OF THE NEURAL-NETWORK SOLUTIONS.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.