SBIR/STTR Research Award

ADVANCED CUTTER DEVELOPMENT FOR EGRESS BORING MACHINES

Award identifier 4f625a31d938328fec1ec4e66fe73695bf2c16a36d418da0fcd2d1e34baab6fdAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$50,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

1987

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Terra Tek Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

CURRENT EGRESS BORING MACHINES, UTILIZING CONVENTIONAL 17-INCH DISC CUTTERS, ARE CAPABLE OF ACHIEVING MAXIMUM ADVANCE RATES OF 80 FEET PER HOUR, BECAUSE OF CUTTER LIMITATIONS. THE AIR FORCE HAS DETERMINED THAT NATIONAL NEEDS REQUIRE SUBSTANTIALLY FASTER BORING RATES. ALSO, IT IS CRUCIAL THAT THE CUTTERS BE CAPABLE OF COMPLETING THE EGRESS SHAFT, WITHOUT ANY MAINTENANCE/REPLACEMENT OF THE CUTTERS. CURRENT CUTTERS, THAT HAVE EVOLVED ESSENTIALLY AS A RESULT OF TRIALAND-ERROR EXPERIMENTS, DESIGN COMPROMISES, AND MANUFACTURING LIMITATIONS, FALL FAR SHORT OF THE AIR FORCE'S GOAL. EXISTING DESIGNS ARE OFTEN SUBJECT TO BOTH BEARING AND CUTTER FAILURES, EVEN WHEN OPERATED BELOW RATED THRUST LEVELS. PROPOSED HEREIN IS AN INNOVATIVE ANALYTICAL-CUM-EXPERIMENTAL STUDY, CENTERED AROUND THE CONCEPT OF A ONE-PIECE HUB/CUTTER RING STRUCTURE. MATERIALS BETTER SUITED FOR THE CUTTER STRUCTURE AND BEARING ELEMENTS HAVE BEEN SELECTED AND DESIGNS PROPOSED FOR EVALUATION IN PHASE I. THE BEST OF THESE WILL BE INCORPORATED TO DEVELOP BASIC CRITERIA TO BE APPLIED FOR DETAILED DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT OF THE CUTTERS IN PHASE II.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.