SBIR/STTR Research Award

Insulation Materials and Methods for Bi2212 Magnets

Award identifier c99fe47c446628ad07155453526bb42d0644621990542a7a21eee809d879cd6eAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$750,000

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2009

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Supercon, Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
FPGJH4FB7XY9
Solicitation number
DE-PS02-07ER07-36
Topic code
51 a

Research abstract

This proposal concerns an investigation of methods and materials for insulating Bi2212 conductor for manufacturing high field magnets. Bi2212 is a high field superconductor that has the highest Jc of any practical superconductor at fields above 15 T. NbTi and Nb3Sn which are the primary materials currently used for high field magnets are limited to magnetic field generation of about 10.5 T and 20 T respectively. To generate magnetic fields greater than 20 T, a new high field conductor such as Bi2212 is needed. However, Bi2212 is a highly reactive compound and must be heat treated in oxygen at temperatures in the range of 890 °C. Currently used insulating materials tend to react with silver and Bi2212 at these temperatures degrading the magnet performance of even causing the loss of the magnet. This proposal seeks to develop an improved insulating material and method for manufacturing Bi2212 magnets. It will develop a method for insulating Bi2212 wire and determining the process conditions that optimize manufacturing magnets from this insulated conductor. Potential applications include particle accelerator and high field NMR magnets. The factors leading to leakage during heat treatment of Bi2212/Ag superconductors were investigated. It was found that the material used for insulating the wire reacted with the silver sheath of the conductor causing the formations of pits, which lead to leakage and degradation of conductor Ic. Several alternate insulation schemes were evaluated for their effect in reducing the reaction with the silver sheath. The Phase II project will encompass developing an alternate approach to insulating Bi2212/Ag conductor with materials that are non reactive with silver, and developing the processing conditions for making coils from this material that meets the requirement for HEP applications. Commercial Applications and other Benefits as described by the awardee: A high field superconductor such as Bi2212 will find its primary application in accelerator magnets for high energy physics. The other major application for the technology is high field nuclear magnetic resonance systems for imaging complex organic compounds and biological materials.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

105 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2012). Reported award amounts total $22,724,253. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.