SBIR/STTR Research Award

Landing Area and Rocket Plume Diagnostics

Award identifier f5651629c59a1cd6a74dc911eee011856b38061a0c6f4b4f44c6d06613d67d2aAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$1,250,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
COMBUSTION RESEARCH & FLOW TECHNOLOGY INC
Proposal award date
2025-02-05
Contract end date
2027-05-06
UEI
XGYZK5MHNJZ8
Solicitation number
22.1
Topic code
AF221-0021

Research abstract

The importance of the Tactically Responsive Launch (TacRL) program lies in the fact that it increases the speed of launch operations allowing for the deployment of satellites and cargo to be made available to personnel at short notice in emergencies or during conflicts. This program aims to take advantage of the growing cadre of private launch providers (Masten Space, SpaceX, Blue Origin, etc.), many of which are funded by venture capital, to achieve these goals. One of the challenges that will be faced during this program is the development of technology that will allow rocket cargo to land on unfinished, irregular surfaces unlike those typically used by the private launch companies mentioned previously. In such cases, it is important to understand the mechanism of interaction between the plume and the various types of landing surfaces that it might encounter. To this end, the overall aim of the proposed effort will be to develop diagnostic tools that are capable of measuring velocity and/or identifying structures involved in plume-ground interactions. These tools will provide measurement data that can be used for validating and improving existing numerical models. The capabilities developed in Phase I will be extended in the Phase II program by including the effects of a planar surface of appropriate quality in order to recreate realistic landing scenarios that might be encountered by rocket-based cargo vehicles that support the TacRL program. Additionally, hardware upgrades in Phase II will allow for enhanced temporal resolution of the flowfield by the use of high-speed cameras that are capable of kHz-rate image acquisition. These modifications will allow for better characterization of the plume-ground interaction mechanism by studying the temporal evolution of flow structures in the plume as they interact with the ground plane and evolve thereafter. These metrics are crucial for assessing surface survivability as well as stand-off distances for personnel and critical ground equipment. The data collected during this program will prove to be an essential validation tool for the computational model that will be deployed by our team using CRAFT Tech’s well-established high-resolution plume CFD solver, CRAFT CFD®.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

303 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1995–2025). Reported award amounts total $121,181,328. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.