SBIR/STTR Research Award

A Global Test of Hemostatic Risk

Award identifier 35cd92a3318486c71ec4859b86409ff6364c19549ed9b01e5a40998f7b803dc6Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$351,562

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2007

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Haematologic Technologies, LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
NBRNPENP8AG9
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Phase I funding for this project supported successful studies that were aimed at demonstrating the feasibility of developing an easy to use, global test in the arena of clinical hemostasis that would be sensitive to antithrombotic drugs, bleeding disorders and thrombotic pathologies. This test comprises a measurement of the rate of thrombin generation and/or total thrombin potential in a non-perturbed, tissue factor-dependent system. Prior to the Phase I study, this test existed as a complicated ten-plus step research based assay that could only be performed by highly skilled and trained technicians. During the Phase I project period we simplified the assay by developing a blood collection tube containing the components necessary for the initiation of coagulation (relipidated tissue factor) and suppression of the contact phase of coagulation (corn trypsin inhibitor). The development of this tube reduces the complexity of the initial steps in the assay since issues of timing along with the formulation and rapid addition of reagents becomes irrelevant. Once the tube was prepared we were able to optimize assay conditions to yield reproducible results that compared nicely to those obtained with the original research-based assay. Additional accomplishments include the development of a stable quench solution, the design and manufacture of a prototype temperature-controlled assay chamber and the initial development of our own thrombin-antithrombin-III (TAT) ELISA. Collectively, the accomplishments associated with the Phase I project period demonstrate our ability to produce all elements necessary for the thrombin-generation assay (TGA). Phase II funding is being requested to support the efforts that are associated with the further refinement, assembly and validation of the complete assay system. This project is devoted to the development of a "Global Test of Hemostatic Risk" that could ultimately identify individuals in the apparently "normal" population who are at risk for the future development of hemostatic complications (thrombosis or bleeding disorders). Furthermore, this test may facilitate the administration and monitoring of individualized therapeutic treatment regimens in the thrombotic and hemorrhagic patient populations.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

12 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1989–2018). Reported award amounts total $2,518,708. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.