SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of a Multiplexed Flow Cytometer Receptor Assay

Award identifier 1f2d373a805d8d57314f63c7c11630f7004f5a2799ab298a308f5f4797ad66d5Awarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$70,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Abraxis, Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
RJQDDAJ66GN3
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

It is well known that many chemicals may disturb the endocrine system. These endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) can cause adverse effects on human health and wildlife. In 1996, Congress directed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) to determine if chemicals used in commerce may have hormonal effects in humans. There are more than 87,000 chemicals used in commerce that need to be evaluated for potential risks. In addition, there are probably an equal number of metabolites and breakdown products that need to be evaluated, many of which potentially could pollute the environment and cause disruption of the endocrine system. The wide variety of potentially estrogenic compounds makes it difficult to predict estrogenicity on a structural basis. A good analytical system should be able to detect EDCs that currently are unknown. At present, animal models are available to study the estrogenic activity of a compound; their disadvantages include high cost and time consumption, as well as the use of animals. There also are in vitro systems, many of them on cellular systems, such as the E-screen, YES assay, and vitellogenin production. Although the cellular assays are effective tools, they require extended periods to obtain a result, and difficulties can arise when real samples are analyzed due to ubiquitous cytotoxic compounds, such as humic acid, which can interfere with cell proliferation. The radioreceptor assay is an effective technique, but it requires the use of radioactivity. Therefore, there is an opportunity to develop an assay system¿in support of the EDSP¿for screening chemicals that determines whether a chemical interacts with the endocrine system simultaneously in a single and reliable high-throughput assay. There also is a market opportunity to develop assays to screen for numerous EDCs in the same sample during the routine testing of water, food, and environmental samples. This research project focuses on the development of a new multiplexed analytical technique using antibodies and receptors in combination with flow cytometry to determine whether a chemical in a sample may interact with the endocrine system. The results of this research will lead to a high-throughput, sensitive, and cost-effective assay in which the estrogenic (bio-effect) activity of compounds can be determined simultaneously in a single sample.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

7 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2002–2013). Reported award amounts total $549,811. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I

Agencies: Department of Agriculture, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.