SBIR/STTR Research Award

Optimizing Facility Health Using System Digital Twins

Award identifier 0c4a876b233d66b88328bbe8464956005c0a88fcff98742a4fc0017b1122ebe9Awarding agency National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Award amount

$898,996

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ITA INTERNATIONAL LLC
Proposal award date
2025-01-30
Contract end date
2027-01-29
UEI
D7SRYQVNKMV3
Solicitation number
STTR 2023-II
Topic code
T11

Research abstract

This research focuses on NASA STTR research topic T11.05: Model-Based Enterprise and creates digital models or twins of the facility enterprise to enable high-complexity decision-making in support of mission, programmatic development, digital transformation, and institutional activities. This model will be capable of: 1. Identifying an optimal sequence of investments for systems in facilities. 2. Scaling to make enterprise-wide recommendations throughout the entire facility inventory. The primary innovation in this proposal is to extend the detail of the current state of the art in relation to facility management optimization model scope (all facilities in the enterprise), below facility-level to system-level detail (all systems in each facility). Team ITA proposes a model-based systems engineering mathematical optimization to recommend best-value use of funds to maximize condition of facilities across the facility enterprise. This model will support resource planning, budget allocation, and work planning for facility managers at the NASA Office of Strategic Infrastructure, Center, and Site levels. Mission Relevancy Tier will provide a priority lens for evaluating investments, but other priorities can be considered, such as facilities/systems aligned to Mission Directorates or functions like space launch or laboratories. Deliverables: Degradation models to estimate the effect of time on facility and system condition. Investment response and cost estimation models to estimate the effect of investment on facility and system condition. A scalable facilities investment optimization model to recommend investments over time, incorporating Mission Relevancy Tier and other relevant, mission-driven, priority frameworks. An operational facilities investment optimization model to generate complete prioritized recommendations for investment to available maintenance actions for all facilities and systems across the NASA facility enterprise over a long-range time horizon.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

7 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2002–2025). Reported award amounts total $1,961,483. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Commerce, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services

Contractor profile

ITA INTERNATIONAL, LLC

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.