SBIR/STTR Research Award

An Assay for Rapid and Sensitive Flu Virus Detection

Award identifier c1a0edade9ef437785084f1f8f5358ed236163fa7e2174a49e84ef9087c1bc3bAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$196,100

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2008

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
CELLEX, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
ULF1BC9KMLS3
Solicitation number
PHS2007-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The specific aims of this Phase I SBIR proposal are to determine the feasibility of a novel detection technology for rapid and sensitive detection of influenza virus. Specifically, we will determine if the manual assay is rapid (about 15 minutes), sensitive (as least 100 times as good as, or better than, an FDA approved antigen test in terms of TCID50 units/mL), reproducible (with CVlt15%) and specific (without false positive results from potentially interfering bacteri al species at concentrations of upto106 cfu/mL). There are five specific aims in the proposed studies, including: 1. Synthesis, purification and qualification of luciferin - 4,7-di-methyl-O-neuraminic acid substrate - Section D1. Our goal is to obta in at least 1 gram of highly purified substrate (gt98% purity by HPLC). 2. Formulation of the detection mix - Section D2. We will prepare a detection mix that contains all necessary reagents for detection of flu viral neuraminidase. The detection mi x will be lyophilized in a single-use detection tube. 3. Assay optimization - Section D3 4. Evaluation of analytical performance - Section D4. Analytical performance of the assay will be evaluated. We will determine the analytical sensitivity for more than 10 strains of human influenza A and human influenza B. 5. Comparison studies and preliminary evaluation using human samples - Section D5. We will perform comparison studies using FDA-approved antigen-based test and RT-PCR assay. In ad dition, we will test some samples collected from human subjects. PUBLIC HEALTH RELVANCE The proposed Phase I SBIR project will evaluate the feasibility of a novel detection technology for rapid and sensitive detection of influenza virus. The techn ology simplifies the detection process by using a master mix which enables one-step detection, i.e., addition of a sample to the master mix followed by light signal measurement, all performed in the same detection tube. The entire process takes 10-15 minut es. Successful development of the proposed influenza virus test will provide a better alternative for rapid flu diagnosis, thereby significantly improving our medical capability for interpandemic influenza and potential pandemic influenza.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

13 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2004–2016). Reported award amounts total $4,942,808. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.