SBIR/STTR Research Award

CAPS-Based Particle Single Scattering Albedo Monitor

Award identifier ffe1732def6bc50237e1f2e32e31210752fca37a6084be53f48fa22dd881ed1dAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$750,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2007

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
AERODYNE RESEARCH INC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
HTMHV7AL9A86
Solicitation number
DE-FG01-05ER05-28
Topic code
09

Research abstract

Aerosol particles affect the radiative balance of the earth directly, by scattering and absorbing solar and terrestrial radiation, and indirectly, by acting as cloud condensation nuclei. It is now recognized that atmospheric loading of aerosols, generated through human activities, can exert an influence on the earth¿s radiation budget comparable in magnitude with greenhouse gases. However, uncertainties in the understanding of both direct and indirect aerosol forcing limit the ability to quantify human influences on climate change. This project will develop a particle single scattering albedo monitor that combines extinction and scattering measurements in one instrument, with rapid time-response, active temperature/relative humidity control, and high sensitivity. This monitor will provide a simpler, smaller, lower cost alternative to cavity ring downbased systems and more traditional instruments with no loss in sensitivity or accuracy. In Phase I, a laboratory prototype was constructed and calibrated. Both particle extinction and absorption coefficients were measured simultaneously using monodisperse polystyrene latex particles ranging in size from 0.1 to 8.0 microns in diameter. A baseline precision for the extinction measurement was ~0.3 Mm-1 in 60 seconds integration time. The monitor¿s response to scattering was flat for particles from 0.1 to 2 microns, but fell to 75% of full response at 8 microns. Modeling indicated that the falloff was caused by use of a highly non-ideal integrating volume. Phase II will develop a robust and improved prototype instrument, which will be compared to a number of commercially available instruments. Once its performance capabilities have been established, the prototype will be used in the field to measure aircraft exhaust and urban air pollution.Commercial Applications and Other Benefits as described by the awardee: The comparatively low cost and ease of use of this sensor should allow almost routine measurement of the scattering properties of atmospheric aerosols, something precluded by the cost and complexity of current instrumentation. Commercial sales should be expected from the atmospheric sciences and environmental pollution research and development communities.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

410 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2025). Reported award amounts total $116,799,166. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.