SBIR/STTR Research Award

CI Toolkit: Helping Children with Cochlear Implants in Inclusive Classrooms

Award identifier bc52ea913946accdfd56b574ff5e500bc94b62788212c6ae943e87c5f7cb9407Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$99,953

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2008

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
KDH Research & Communication, Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
NWLEP7EH4JN7
Solicitation number
PHS2007-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): In this Fast Track project, KDHRC will develop and evaluate the CI School Toolkit, a comprehensive set of materials to support parents, teachers, and children as a child with a cochlear implant (CI) enters an inclusive classroom environment. These integrated, multimedia and print materials will 1) support parents as they work with teachers and the school to create the most supportive learning environment for their child with a CI, 2) assist educators in creating the best learning and listening setting for children with a CI, and 3) help children with a CI educate their peers about hearing loss and cochlear implants, to increase social acceptance, reduce stigma, and create a more supportive school environment. The toolkit will consist of print, video, and web-based materials and will be developed with extensive input from the target audience and a panel of experts in the field. The long-term objective of this project is to provide the educational and advocacy communities wi th a tool to optimize school entry and inclusion for children with CIs. After developing the materials, we will conduct a robust evaluation of the efficacy of the Toolkit in two stages: 1) an evaluation of the component parts in a series of two-gro up, pretest/post-test, quasi-experimental studies and 2) a field test of the product with parent/teacher dyads at the time when a child with a CI is entering an inclusive classroom. The Toolkit will then be distributed nationwide with the help of KDHRC's c ommercialization partners. More children with cochlear implants are entering inclusive classrooms. This trend will continue as the FDA-approved minimum age for implantation becomes younger, and the literature continues to show that age of implantation is a strong predictor of later language proficiency. Research has shown cost-savings of approximately 30,000 to 200,000 for every deaf child with a CI educated in an inclusive environment. However, these benefits are only realized if the educational environm ent optimizes true inclusion. The proposed Toolkit will ease the school entry process for parents, teachers, and youth by providing comprehensive educational materials in an easy-to-implement format.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

36 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2008–2025). Reported award amounts total $21,009,583. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.