SBIR/STTR Research Award

Synthetic Substitutes of Surgical Gut Sutures

Award identifier c74edd2a0f646cfd1ad43254673b9f84d24aec3871feed3d66d185e0b39ffe0bAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$749,999

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
POLY-MED, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
L67LQ9NBEMB7
Solicitation number
PHS2006-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Phase I study was intended and did demonstrate feasibility of developing synthetic polyester monofilament sutures as alternatives to surgical gut sutures (SGS) with preferred properties in term of initial mechanical properties, strength retention profile, and tissue reactivity. Phase I results showed that (1) polyaxial amorphous polymeric initiators can be end-grafted with glycolide to produce crystalline fiber- forming segmented copolyesters (SP) and (2) two SP-based monofilaments were identified as candidates for further development in Phase II. Although the compliance of these monofilaments was higher compared to dry SGS, they were stiffer than wet SGS. Hence, post-Phase I studies were pursued on other polyaxial fiber-forming compositions which can be used to prepare compliant monofilaments with a modulus of less than 100 Kpsi while remaining competitive with SGS in terms of other suture properties. And segmented polyaxial grafted polyesters (SPGs) having chains made of practically amorphous polytrimethylene carbonate core and highly segmented crystallizable terminal components based principally on glycolide and e-caprolactone were explored and shown to have more promising properties than the SPs. Hence, Phase II objective was revised to focus on the development of the SPG system primarily to produce compliant monofilament sutures as preferred alternatives to plain and chromic SGS. And, Phase II plans entail (1) optimization of two SPG systems selected in post-Phase I to choose one final system to produce preferred alternatives to plain and chromic SGS, with and without reliance on significant radiation-dose modulation of their properties; (2) completion of development and process validation studies on selected sutures based on the final SPG system; (3) completion of comparative in vitro and in vivo studies of SGS and their synthetic SPG-based alternatives (SGS-A); (4) initiation of safety, stability, and scale-up studies on SGS-A; (5) completing exploratory studies on other SPs and/or SPGs as preferred alternatives to certain absorbable commercial monofilaments; and (6) completing Phase III plans.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

24 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1996–2014). Reported award amounts total $4,327,056. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.