SBIR/STTR Research Award

IGA Mid-Processing Modeling Tools for FSI in Vehicle Mobility Applications

Award identifier a0e0e2b31920cf43ed4f18ac6ce1a53868d6558280f2be7eeb05431d814553b4Awarding agency Department of Defense · Army

Award amount

$203,936

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Army
Recipient company
YB Numerics, Inc.
Proposal award date
2025-01-17
Contract end date
2025-07-16
UEI
PJFKEBVNKMN9
Solicitation number
24.B
Topic code
A24B-T008

Research abstract

The US Army develops, oversees, and deploys a wide variety of vehicles, ranging from rotary-wing aircraft to medium/long-range hypersonic projectiles. These vehicles operate in many flow regimes, from slow-moving rotorcraft to projectiles flying at hypersonic speeds. In addition, the army vehicles are often subjected to extreme events, such as blast, which need to be mitigated to minimize vehicle damage. The US Army has a critical need to not only understand the flight characteristics of its vehicles, which vary greatly depending on the flight regime of interest, but also to reliably predict them. This, in turn, requires the US Army to be equipped with advanced modeling capabilities and tools that enable the simulation of complex-geometry, fixed- and rotary-wing vehicles in flight conditions ranging from subsonic to hypersonic.  Isogeometric Analysis (IGA) is a next-generation computational method that has brought superior accuracy to spatial and temporal discretization in fluid and structural mechanics simulations. IGA, because of its special higher-order nature, has several very desirable features in multiscale computation of flow and fluid–structure interaction (FSI) problems that are ubiquitous in mobility applications. Every computational analysis starts with a suitable definition of the problem geometry followed by mesh generation for that geometry. However, mesh generation in IGA, such as Non-Uniform Rational B-Spline (NURBS) mesh generation, is not as established as in the standard discretizations such as Finite Difference (FD) and Finite Element (FE) methods. Our recent STTR Phase I and II efforts focused on making IGA-based flow and FSI computations more powerful and more practical, by developing core NURBS mesh generation methods and tools that make meshing for IGA less arduous, more straightforward, more automated, and basically as established as it is now for the FD and FE methods.  However, bringing even higher fidelity and higher efficiency to IGA FSI simulations will require the development of IGA mesh generation methods and tools that go beyond the core technology developed in. In the present STTR effort we plan to focus on the next-generation IGA Mid-Processing Tools to support IGA-based aerodynamics and FSI simulations. These tools will include a) Unstructured mesh generation and refinement for IGA (e.g., using T-Splines); b) Mesh moving methods based on advanced fiber-reinforced hyperelasticity concepts; c) Methods that enable computations of IGA-suitable local length scales and stabilization parameters, which play a key role in the accuracy and stability of variational multiscale (VMS) analysis of flows; and d) Methods for efficient visualization of IGA-based solutions. This effort will bring multiscale computational flow and FSI analysis to a new level where it can make a much higher impact and provide the US Army with advanced aerodynamic analysis and design capabilities, which is an area of critical competency.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

3 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2020–2025). Reported award amounts total $1,469,008. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.