SBIR/STTR Research Award

Low-Cost Expendable RF Emitter System

Award identifier 446841b18f76254ed76431561b7bc87c34212855ebfee10c1950091d679d9c81Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$52,970

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
SPECTRUM DEFENSE SYSTEMS, INC.
Proposal award date
2025-01-16
Contract end date
2025-04-17
UEI
YQ5NYKXM54M3
Solicitation number
X24.7
Topic code
AFX247-PCSO1

Research abstract

The proposed project seeks to further develop a low-cost, expendable, modular radio threat emitter system, originally created for the U.S. Army, to transition it to the Air Force. Capable of replicating a range of threat signals, from communications used by armored vehicles to radar emissions and deceptive signals, these emitters are designed for military training, deception, and electronic warfare (EW) operations. The system offers a modular and scalable solution, supporting both small-unit training and large-scale operations. This provides the U.S. Air Force and other military branches with a flexible tool to address evolving threat emulation and deception needs.Current threat emulation technology is often costly and large in form factor, limiting its use in diverse training and deception environments. This capability gap affects the readiness of military personnel, particularly in realistic electronic warfare, deception, and counter-radar training scenarios. Our proposed emitter system addresses these gaps by delivering a remotely controlled, ATAK/WinTAK-compatible solution that is easy to operate, rapidly deployable, expendable, and customizable for various environments, enabling quick control from the platoon level up through the chain of command.Phase 1 of this project will focus on identifying capability gaps within the Air Force’s training, deception, and electronic warfare programs by engaging key USAF stakeholders. The objective is to align our emitter system's development with specific operational needs and gaps identified by Air Force personnel. This phase will consist of a comprehensive customer discovery process, where we will actively engage USAF units responsible for training, deception, and EW operations.We will conduct a series of outreach meetings with USAF personnel, aiming to establish relationships with operational and training units, as well as technical experts responsible for managing threat emulation and deception systems. These meetings will allow us to gather feedback about current system limitations, such as high costs, lack of expendability, or deployment complexity. By understanding these gaps, we will tailor the development of our emitter system to provide a more effective and adaptable solution for the Air Force.Additionally, we will identify opportunities where our modular and expendable emitter system can be integrated into existing Air Force training and deception operations, ensuring compatibility with infrastructure such as ATAK, WinTAK, and command control systems. This feedback loop with stakeholders will form the basis of a feasibility study, evaluating the potential of our system to meet operational needs across multiple levels, from platoon-level control to large-scale field exercises.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.