SBIR/STTR Research Award

Long Stroke Wavefront Correctors for Retinal Imaging

Award identifier 5fac514638f0dda0069587c09fd28223810882a09a878c4269355996f4ab269bAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$524,157

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2007

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Boston Micromachines Corporation
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
SM8TM1GMFMY9
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): This proposal describes a plan to develop long stroke MEMS deformable mirrors suitable for use in commercial ophthalmic adaptive optics. They will be designed to permit diffraction-limited retinal imaging through dilated pupils in at least 90% of the human population. Electrostatic actuator design and manufacturing processes demonstrated in Phase I research will be used as a foundation for these MEMS-DMs, which will be produced using silicon wafer batch-manufacturing. Based on prior research, it is estimated compensation of aberrations of the eye will require up to 12fm of wavefront compensation (with focus and astigmatism compensated before MEMS-DM correction). Because mirror deformation is doubled in the wavefront by reflection, this will require a DM with at least 6fm of stroke at each actuator. A second goal will be to demonstrate diffraction-limited retinal imaging in human subjects possessing optical aberrations of the eye that encompasses more than 90% of the range found in the population. The long-stroke MEMS deformable mirror will be combined with the optical doubler demonstrated in the Phase I effort to achieve an effective deformable mirror motion of 12fm, corresponding to 24fm of wavefront correction, and will be integrated into a proven adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope design. Adding the optical doubler to the system will allow for the deformable mirror to correct for low order (astigmatic) aberrations. This large stroke, combined with a Badal optometer design, will eliminate the need to use corrective lenses for each subject eye and allow unprecedented in vivo imaging of the human retina. Researchers and clinicians have been unable to see critical features in the human retina due to ocular aberrations that limited imaging resolution. A successful completion of the proposed project will provide the enabling component for better resolution imaging of the human retina than ever before. This improvement in image quality will allow clinicians to detect and diagnose diabetic retinopathy and macular degeneration as well as to determine the efficacy of drugs in drug studies.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

38 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1999–2024). Reported award amounts total $15,546,351. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.