SBIR/STTR Research Award

Inert-Gas Buffering for Particle Size Separation of Superconductor Precursor Powders

Award identifier 3ee8c091e4b57a11fc73459f935dcec51a35a87433bd6fe1f13d41a291e747d7Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$328,600

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Accelerator Technology Corporation
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
QYNJE3HLPVM5
Solicitation number
DE-FG02-06ER06-09
Topic code
35

Research abstract

The removal of all particles over a desired micron-scale size threshold from a powder sample is critical to the development of fine-filament, powder-in-tube superconducting wires, for which the final filament size is limited by the largest particles in the precursor powder filling. This project will develop a particle-removal technology that disperses the powder in an aerosol suspension and then passes the dispersed powder through a Stokes-flow geometry, in which the powder particles are separated. The basic approach has been used for several decades for size classification, but never for separation of bulk quantities of powder. In previous work, a slot-geometry impactor was developed and evaluated for bulk separation applications. Phase I improved the earlier process in three respects: (1) dry nitrogen gas was used as the buffer gas rather than air, in order to eliminate contamination of the precursor powders; (2) a fluidized-bed dispersal system was developed to increase mass loading without aggregation; and (3) a boundary-sheet flow of powder-free gas was introduced along the walls of the impactor structure, in order to suppress particle wall interactions that limit large mass loadings. In Phase II, an electron-beam-assisted precipitator will be developed to remove the separated fines from the aerosol flow. The present pressurized inert-gas flow will be converted into a recirculating closed-circuit flow. The slot impactor vane structure will be rebuilt with 1-m-long vanes, and manifolds for supply, exhaust, and boundary flow along the vane structure will be pressure-equalized to assure a uniform Stokes threshold along the extended geometry. Commercial Applications and other Benefits as described by the awardee: In addition to high-performance superconductors, the technology also should be applicable to the separation of particles used in specialty sintered metal and ceramic materials for aerospace and defense, and in consumer products. For ceramics, large particles cause stress concentrations, which cause brittle fracture. For sunscreen, powders utilize Ti2O3, the most effective UV absorber; however, Ti2O3 is also the pigment for white paint, and makes skin appear pasty. By reducing particle size, the powder becomes invisible, while retaining its UV protection capability

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

18 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1994–2021). Reported award amounts total $2,529,151. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.