SBIR/STTR Research Award

System and Algorithm Concepts for Automatic Detection and Classification of non traditional signals

Award identifier 5a9b182a18ecab4006f02d5d822f2fad84429a03178614323b81aa6d7f1f834eAwarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$69,917

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

1997

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
PLANNING SYSTEMS, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
DKHXM53V1BU5
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

A technical approach to exploiting a specific type of non-traditional signal is proposed. This method is highly motivated by the signal properties of a class of signals known as C2 signals. A front to back detection and classification processing chain is discussed which exploits four properties of the signals. These are 1) signal periodicity, 2) the time-frequency nature of each pulse, 3) the duration of each pulse, and 4) the length of time from the beginning of one pulse to the other. The periodicity is detected via the auto-correlation of the signal envelope. The time-frequency information is analyzed by computing a 1 28x 1 28 time-frequency representation of the signal, then performing a 2-13 wavelet transform, and finally utilizing a small subset of the wavelet coefficients as classification features. These features are input to a neural network which is then used as a classifier. Gating functions based upon the final two properties are used to determine if the signals fall with acceptable ranges of signal duration and period. Much of the software for this approach already exists. PSI has extensive experience in transient analysis, and the technical approach is based upon intimate knowledge of the signals to be exploited. Vortical flows are essential features of most aerodynamic flowfields and generally determine flight vehicle maneuverability, aerodynamic load 4 ng and performance. However, our current understanding of the mechanisms of vortex viscous-inviscid interactions is insufficient to allow computational design of aerodynamic and structural design without recourse to experimental verification. At, present, significant efforts are being made to effect design changes which will decrease dynamic loading and improve fighter aircraft agility, maneuverability and performance. But, although significant progress has been Made in computational aerodynamics and associated structural response, reliable design changes cannot be made without recourse to extensive wind tunnel and flight testing. To alleviate this problem, it is proposed to develop innovative vortex measurement and control techniques and to conduct a series of experiments which will provide a detailed vortex flowfield modeling data base which could be used to guide and assess the performance of computational codes.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

141 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2005). Reported award amounts total $31,445,938. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Commerce, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Education, Department of Transportation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.