SBIR/STTR Research Award

Feasibility Study for Integrating Hydrogen Propulsion and Aircraft Automation in a Cessna Caravan

Award identifier ac496ea3bfa0e25521e6dcd067ee0eb2854840803251622b88b953a876f5863dAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$74,990

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
ZEROAVIA, INC
Proposal award date
2025-01-14
Contract end date
2025-04-17
UEI
M4TQNBFTTLQ7
Solicitation number
X24.7
Topic code
AFX247-PCSO1

Research abstract

ZeroAvia and Reliable Robotics propose to conduct a feasibility study on integrating hydrogen-electric propulsion with advanced aircraft automation technology in a Cessna Caravan platform. This study will explore the synergies between clean propulsion and autonomous flight systems to enable a new class of zero-emission, highly automated aircraft with potential to revolutionize Air Force logistics, ISR, and distributed operations. The feasibility study will focus on:Analyzing how propulsion system data outputs (e.g. throttle response, temperatures) can be integrated into automation system control logic and instrumentation requirements.Modeling integrated system performance and control architectures for the combined hydrogen-electric powertrain and automation systems.Assessing physical and electrical integration constraints within the Cessna Caravan airframe.Developing a preliminary system architecture for the integrated solution.Identifying key technical risks and mitigation strategies.Analyzing performance and payload/range capabilities for typical Air Force use cases.The proposed effort leverages ZeroAvia's proven hydrogen-electric powertrain technology, which offers higher energy density than batteries and even jet fuel when using liquid hydrogen. This will be combined with Reliable Robotics' certified automation technology to enable autonomous and remotely-piloted operations. The integration of these technologies creates an opportunity for extended range, increased payload capacity, reduced emissions, and enhanced operational flexibility compared to both conventional and battery-electric aircraft.Key technical challenges to be addressed include:Optimizing interfaces between propulsion data and automation systemsDesigning integrated control architecturesManaging thermal and electrical integration within existing airframe constraintsEnsuring safety and reliability of the combined systemThe feasibility study will lay the groundwork for potential prototype development and flight testing in future phases. If successful, this technology could enable sustainable, long-range autonomous aircraft for military logistics, ISR, distributed operations, and commercial applications. The dual-use potential aligns with Air Force priorities for energy resilience, emissions reduction, and overcoming pilot shortages. By combining ZeroAvia's expertise in hydrogen-electric propulsion with Reliable Robotics' capabilities in aircraft automation, this project aims to advance the technical baseline for zero-emission autonomous aviation and explore a promising solution to critical Air Force needs.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.