SBIR/STTR Research Award

Implant Design and Development for Human Cortical Recording

Award identifier c53ca6da182d4c500abe2ff5acba3503f621ace63c717754ad913f2ee1ce6a02Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$757,243

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Neural Signals Inc
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
JWNALJFLRAH3
Solicitation number
PHS2006-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): In the field of cortical control signal acquisition, the recording system is a critical bottleneck for the passage of internal signals to external applications. It is agreed in this field that there are cortical control signals that can be used to control prosthetic devices and restore movement to paralyzed limbs, but these signals must be recorded and transmitted rapidly and intact. It is our goal to complete the development of a wireless, scalable 128-channel recording system, suitable for long-term human use. Applications range from communication for locked-in patients, to environmental control for the disabled, to motion restoration for the spinal cord injury population. Using two recently completed Phase I grants, Neural Signals has the necessary experience to meet this goal. The first Phase I effort (1 R43 NS-42478-01) designed and built an 8-channel, flexible, surface mount assembly, including a wireless inductive power supply, internal calibration, eight recording amplifiers, and eight FM transmitters. The hybrid circuit developed during this grant resulted in a four-fold reduction in the recording system's volume, compared to our previous implantable recording system. The second Phase I grant (1 R43 NS048706-01) has just been completed. During this grant, a 16-channel integrated circuit (1C) was fabricated to amplify signals from cortical electrodes and multiplex the signals using an analog scanner. Specific aims in Phase II are: A: Continue development of the integrated circuit device, (1) by incorporating voltage regulation and bias circuitry into the integrated circuit to minimize external semiconductor components; (2) by improving the floating gate recording amplifier and scanner based on knowledge gained during the Phase I development; (3) by continuing to develop (a) the power induction system and (b) a unique synchronous scanner transmission system that will replace the present FM system. B: Miniaturize the Neurotrophic Electrode connections for reliable connection with the 1C device. C: Choose and implement new coatings and perform soak testing and stress testing of the implantable recording device consisting of the recording amplifiers, power supply, wireless signal transmission and attached electrodes.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

9 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1998–2009). Reported award amounts total $1,826,811. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.