SBIR/STTR Research Award

A Portable High Resolution Detector for Rapid Field Arsenic Test in Drinking Wate

Award identifier 5a35647a3d06447e103058730b8ced844acd9cdf2085d871f4ad8c71a56f5e39Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Award amount

$499,140

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2011

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Recipient company
AGILTRON, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
K33SCYLG8EN1
Solicitation number
PA10-050
Topic code
NCEH

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The combination of high toxicity and widespread occurrence has created a pressing need for effective monitoring of arsenic in groundwater. Through this program Agiltron will develop a field deployable monitoring tool based on surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) for rapid on-site detection and quantification of arsenic in groundwater. During operation in the field, the SERS sensor module can be inserted directly into samples of groundwater brought up to the surfaceor lowered directly into the water well with the use of long fiber length for on-site arsenic detection and quantification. The proposed system will be able to detect arsenic in groundwater at 1 ppb concentration level, in situ, on-site, with little or nosample preparation, and with no interferences. During Phase I we have successfully demonstrated the detection of 1 ppb level arsenic in water samples using the proposed portable SERS system. In Phase II the performance of the proposed SERS system will beoptimized for highest throughput at the wavelength of interest by using suitable excitation wavelength and SERS substrates with optimized localized surface plasmon resonance properties. On-site measurement of arsenic in groundwater in local water wells will be conducted. The feedback from these field studies will be used to further develop/improve the performance of individual components so that an optimized monitoring system suitable for practical site operation can be developed and are ready for manufacture. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: As one of the most common contaminants in groundwater worldwide, Arsenic is a well-known toxic chemical that the Environmental Protection Agency and the World Health Organization list as a known carcinogen. The World Health Organization and US guidelines recommend the arsenic values in drinking water to be no more than 10 mg/L (ppb). The proposed portable arsenic detection system can enable the detection of arsenic in groundwater at 1 ppb concentration level, in situ, on-site, with little or no sample preparation, and with no interferences.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

234 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2001–2017). Reported award amounts total $47,152,840. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Homeland Security

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.