SBIR/STTR Research Award

Computerized Antipsychotic Evaluation System

Award identifier 03cd9090aafe412568994cca6320e9ac56877b8d16b4b4ee82c24506137890d1Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$704,551

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
NEUROCOMP SYSTEMS
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
PJM6K5B7YMA5
Solicitation number
PHS2005-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Wide-ranging neurocognitive assessment is an integral component of controlled clinical trials of candidate antipsychotic treatments. However, manual administration of large neurocognitive test batteries is inefficient, error prone, and does not meet the needs for standardization across multiple sites. The project objective is to develop an advanced, wide spectrum computerized neurocognitive assessment system that will provide a single, unified platform for comprehensive administration and management of various protocols, sufficient to meet the requirements of a minimum of 75% of controlled clinical trials as well as related research applications. The computerized antipsychotic evaluation system (CAES) will introduce an unprecedented range of content, functionality and utility integration. Advantages include: (a) increased data quality through standardized, multimedia-based administration; (b) integral multimedia-based examiner training for all tests; (c) automated project reporting and documentation; (d) automated patient tracking and scheduling; (e) automated protocol compliance; (f) reduced examiner requirements and errors; (g) automatic generation and tracking of CRFs; (h) automated electronic database transfer and (i) correspondingly reduced costs. The computer platform is uniquely suited to assessment of impaired subjects due to its interactive, dual-display and control architecture that integrates a human examiner, enabling precise control of every step of the administration process for any test. An examiner can score verbal report and overt behavioral performance in real time, an important capability not available in the current generation of single-display systems. The CAES dual-monitor architecture will be implemented on an advanced cognitive assessment platform (ACAP) hardware device, providing comprehensive electronic patient response capture and conferring portability. To ensure relevance of the assessment instrument set, as well as system functions for application in clinical trials, development will be guided by a steering committee of recognized authorities in the field of schizophrenia research, including members of the NIMH-sponsored CATIE (Clinical Antipsychotic Trials in Intervention Effectiveness) consortium. The technical utility, concurrent validity and acceptability of the CAES test instruments and examiner training module (ETM) will be determined in a multicenter study.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

29 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1988–2023). Reported award amounts total $11,394,064. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.