SBIR/STTR Research Award

Inductive Plasma Accelerator

Award identifier 4599300789711a5842cb75225322675401167968f413bf7c296adf3a5ad2c10aAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$652,500

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
MSNW LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
ZUJKEA8YLMC6
Solicitation number
DOE/SC-0072
Topic code
01 d

Research abstract

75650S For the plasma jet liner approach to magnetized target fusion, a plasma accelerator is required that is capable of launching a plasma jet with a mass of 0.2 mg to 0.4 mg and a diameter no larger than about 20 cm. In addition, the accelerator must be capable of attaining plasma/plasmoid velocities in excess of 200 km/s, a timing precision better than a microsecond down to nanoseconds, and a controllable density profile of high uniformity and purity. This project will achieve the desired acceleration parameters by designing and constructing an inductive plasmoid accelerator (IPA). In addition, two IPAs will be merged to form a suitable target plasmoid that will be compressed to high density and temperature with a suitable plasma liner, providing the first experimental test of the plasma liner fusion concept. In Phase I, the inductive plasma accelerator was analyzed analytically and numerically to determine an optimal configuration for application to the plasma liner approach to target fusion. A complete design of the inductive plasma accelerator to be built was executed. Additional analysis and design was conducted on an experimental testbed for merging accelerated plasmoids and compressing with a plasma liner. Phase II will construct a plasmoid accelerator and produce a magnetized plasmoid that is suitable for the formation of the target plasmoid as well as for later compression by an array of similar plasmoids. An interaction chamber will be constucted that is capable of producing a plasma liner for compression experiments. Simulations will be performed for all three components of the experimental work: the acceleration of two plasmoids, their merging, and the formation of a plasma liner followed by the radial implosion of the plasma liner onto the colliding plasmoids. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits as described by the awardee: The inductive plasma accelerator (IPA) should have a natural application to high power electric propulsion in space. The IPA also should be readily adapted as a fueler for future fusion reactors such as the international fusion reactor (ITER) now being planned. It also could find application in current tokamak experiments, in order to add rotational momentum and velocity shear for enhanced stability and transport control.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

26 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1999–2017). Reported award amounts total $8,094,788. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.