SBIR/STTR Research Award

Intra-operative radiographic margin assessment tool for breast-conserving surgery

Award identifier 86830b678a6580b0302126666fb7563792375af05b51d8a574af8a031527e28dAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$99,038

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2008

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
SURGICAL TOOLS, LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2007-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is commonly defined as the surgical removal of a breast tumor with a safe margin of normal tissue. When supplemented with radiation therapy, BCS is generally referred to as breast-conserv ing therapy, or BCT. Local recurrence of breast cancer is a serious increased risk in patients undergoing BCS. For example, Atkins and colleagues have shown that the local recurrence rate following local excision was 16%, compared with 8% following mastect omy, even when supplemented with radiotherapy and chemotherapy5. Since the objective of BCS is not to leave any cancer behind in the breast, obtaining tumor-negative margins when performing BCS is the standard of care to minimize the risk of local recurren ce6. Despite the attempt to achieve negative margins, primary excision for BCS yields histologically positive margins 20% to 55% of the time7. Furthermore, permanent section histopathology, the gold standard of determining margin status, is generally not a vailable until well after the patient has left the operating room. As a result, a high percentage of patients (20 to 55% of patients with positive margins in primary excision) must return to the hospital for surgical re-excisions. Intra-operative methods o f margin assessment, which are designed to provide information on margin status while the patient is still on the operating table, have so far been of limited clinical value. The long-term objective of this research is to improve the sensitivity and specif icity of intra-operative margin assessment techniques for breast tissue specimens excised during BCS, and thus reduce surgical re-excision rates associated with this procedure. Phase I study objectives are: Specific Aim 1: Design and develop a surgical spe cimen container optimized for BCS. Specific Aim 2: Develop simulated excised breast tissue specimens with embedded simulated microcalcifications, nodules and fibers, which realistically depict both the physical and x-ray imaging characteristics of actual c linical breast tissue specimens. Specific Aim 3: Perform the pre-clinical evaluation of the specimen container against established clinical requirements of BCS utilizing simulated excised breast tissue specimens. We propose to quantify the efficacy of this tool with respect to: orthogonal x-ray imaging of specimens; providing optimal compression of specimens; and its ability to retain the three dimensional spatial orientation of the specimen from the time the specimen is excised in the operating room to the time the specimen is delivered to the Pathology Department.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.