SBIR/STTR Research Award

Head Up CPR and Aortic Occlusion to Improve Survival after Refractory Cardiac Arrest

Award identifier b7aa295b3ceb72b9f771acaf9b9f0bc724adb7c0a90fa8d62d59217500faf96dAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$396,978

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Resuscitation Innovations, LLC dba AdvancedCPR Solutions
Proposal award date
2025-01-01
Contract end date
2027-01-23
UEI
G621SSW9F3L5
Solicitation number
PA24-253
Topic code
NHLBI

Research abstract

Abstract In 2024 there will be nearly 800,000 cardiac arrest cases in the US alone. Of those only about 50,000 will have a full recovery. More than 750,000 patients will have no hope for meaningful survival. That is because there is no currently demonstrable effective treatment for refractory (R)-CA patients, the enormous subgroup of patients who invariably die annually from this leading cause of death. Depending upon the presenting rhythm, CA becomes refractory to current interventions, herein defined as a <2% survival, <10 minutes after starting conventional (C) CPR. This application is focused on a better treatment for patients with CA refractory to current management strategies, regardless of the initial rhythm presentation. Patients in R-CA cannot be resuscitated with C-CPR, defibrillation for a shockable rhythm, and vasopressor therapy, such as epinephrine, fluids, and anti-arrhythmic drugs. For over a half century we have failed to effectively treat R-CA: we have not known how. Occasionally transcutaneous cardiac pacing, ECMO and/or double sequential defibrillation can be used with some benefit for the very small percentage of patients that remain in refractory ventricular fibrillation (R-VF). However, in general these treatment strategies rarely work for R-CA, especially in patients with a non-shockable presenting rhythm that comprise 75-85% of all CA cases. However, the applicants recently observed that the addition of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) to automated Head Up Position (AHUP) CPR resulted in a synergistic and remarkable improvement in coronary and cerebral perfusion pressures after more than 30 minutes of AHUP-CPR in pigs. This discovery suggests that REBOA + AHUP CPR may provide more definitive treatment for R-CA or, at a minimum, a bridge to more definitive therapy. Based upon these new findings, the applicants intend to test the hypothesis that the addition of REBOA to AHUP-CPR for R- CA will significantly improve brain and vital organ blood flow and increase the likelihood of neurologically- favorable survival in a well-established pre-clinical model.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2025). Reported award amounts total $895,431. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.