SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of a Tetravalent Dengue Vaccine that Links Innate and Adaptive Immuni

Award identifier 146d6aadef732b1bf352b1bcf093381161ad725d001aaf02d2e04711ae942d33Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$298,530

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2007

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
VAXINNATE CORPORATION
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): We propose to develop a tetravalent dengue (DEN) vaccine using a novel strategy that will ensure broad protection against DEN virus infection. The disease dengue is caused by four mosquito-borne serologically related flaviviruses and development of a DEN vaccine has been particularly challenging because sequential infection by different DEN serotypes/viruses can lead to DEN hemorrhagic fever (DHF) or dengue shock syndrome (DSS), both of which are life-threatening. As a consequence of this phenomenon, an efficacious and safe vaccine needs to be tetravalent and provide protective immunity simultaneously against all four DEN viruses. Attempts at developing a tetravalent live or attenuated vaccine have thus far failed due to problems with interference, poor immunogenicity and generation of an imbalanced immune response. Here, we present an innovative DEN vaccine strategy designed to overcome these limitations. Our approach involves targeting a mixture of recombinant proteins to antigen-presenting cells by linking a protective antigen to a Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligand. Engagement of a TLR with its associated ligand triggers the innate immune system and initiates a series of events that impact the adaptive immune response. This eliminates the need for adjuvants or carriers typically used in vaccine formulations and increases vaccine potency by enhancing immunogenicity without increasing toxicity. With this strategy, we have successfully developed influenza and West Nile (WN) vaccine candidates that can be produced economically, induce potent antibody responses, are efficacious in mouse models and do not require adjuvant. The goal of this proposal is to develop a tetravalent DEN vaccine by engineering four monovalent fusion proteins comprised of the DEN EIII domain of the envelope protein from each DEN virus fused to bacterial flagellin, a potent TLR5 ligand. To assess induction of DEN virus type-specific neutralizing antibodies, the efficacy and specificity of the immune response to each monovalent vaccine candidate will be examined in mice. These monovalent studies will guide identification of a preclinical tetravalent formulation that will involve a mixture of all four fusion proteins at ratios necessary to induce an equitable immune response. A tetravalent combination will be optimized in mice and tested in a non-human primate challenge model as proof-of-concept. We hypothesize that a cocktail formulation of all four monovalent proteins will induce a balanced tetravalent immune response and provide type-specific protection against all four DEN viruses without the risk of producing antibodies that may enhance DEN infection and lead to DHF.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.