SBIR/STTR Research Award

Modeling and Diagnostics of Gel Propellant Mixing and Combustion

Award identifier 071c708b5e7fb2c1abc7bd9c635cc33983517598af4132db6e16bd8401c7a2ecAwarding agency Department of Defense · Army

Award amount

$119,967

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2001

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Army
Recipient company
CFD Research Corporation
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
V3KCP1HNFM33
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

The capability to experimentally characterize the flow patterns of gel engine mixing and combustion, as well as validate numerical simulation technology that predicts detailed engine operation, is proposed. The Phase I analysis methodology will be basedon 1) advanced gel rheology behavior simulation expertise; 2) existing bipropellant and pintle motor system modeling software; and 3) state-of-the-art liquid bipropellant combustion transient CFD methodology. Numerical simulations will focus on identifingtrade-offs between MMH gel carbon loading versus plume signature, matching variable temperature fuel and oxidizer gel rheology to achieve consistent mixture ratios, refining current injection techniques (both vortex and pintle) for improved engineperformance, and optimizing nozzle shape to maximize Cf. Existing FMTI test data will be utilized to validate gel motor flow phenomena sub-models. The Phase I modeling effort will be relied upon to select the most appropriate laser diagnostics approachfor quantifying the mass concentrations and temperatures within the gel combustion and associated plume expansion processes. During the Phase I option program the methodologies developed here will be applied to ongoing FMTI development activities. InPhase II, a comprehensive laser diagnostics system will be assembled within existing AMCOM gel motor test operations. This system will be utilized to generate benchmark quality gel combustion data suitable for identifying gel combustion refinements andvalidating high fidelity gel propulsion numerical simulations.The developed analysis techniques, laser diagnostics, and test hardware will have immediate impact on AMCOM sponsored smart propulsion initiatives and propulsion manufacturers in the design,analysis and testing of gelled propulsion systems. Other applications include numerous industrial pneumatic actuation control systems and bipropellant throttling within the marine and space propulsion industries. CFDRC's close working relationships withpropulsion system manufacturers (TRW, Atlantic Research, Aerojet, Thiokol, etc.) assures rapid technology/expertise transfer and rapid Phase III commercialization, respectively.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

947 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2026). Reported award amounts total $350,893,199. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation, Department of Commerce, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.