SBIR/STTR Research Award

Novel Therapeutic Agents for Diabetic Ulcers

Award identifier f11ec011b34c33ad327c7c5666559eae1cf523ebb898b70dd986f256a0bea613Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$182,189

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2008

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
AUXAGEN, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
J74LH5EBZDA9
Solicitation number
PHS2007-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Diabetes mellitus afflicts 20.8 million people, or 7% of the population, in the United States. Fifteen percent, or 2.4 million people, will develop diabetic foot ulcers in their life time. Diabetic foot ulceration and i nfections are a major cause of hospitalization of diabetic patients. The direct and indirect costs of ulcer management and treatment exceed 10 billion dollars per year. In spite of this, approximately 1000 amputations are still performed on people with dia betes each week in the USA due to the lack of effective therapy for diabetic foot ulcers. Attempts to treat diabetic foot ulcers with growth factors have resulted in little success. Increasing evidence indicates that TGF-a is involved in the early and late phases of peripheral neuropathy and microvascular disease, both of which contribute to the development of diabetic foot ulcers. In diabetic patients, the plasma level of TGF-a is increased; TGF-a expression is also increased in diabetic wounds. TGF-a is a potent chemoattractant for inflammatory cells and inhibitor of endothelial and epithelial cell growth. It has been implicated in prolonged inflammation, defective angiogenesis and retarded wound re-epithelialization, as seen in diabetic foot ulcers. TGF-a appears to be an ideal therapeutic target for treating diabetic foot ulcers. However, no effective TGF-a antagonists have been developed. Recently, we developed TGF-a peptide antagonists (termed TGF-a peptantagonists) which are the only known TGF-a recept or antagonists and have been shown to accelerate normal wound healing in several animal burn/excision wound models. The efficacy of TGF-a peptantagonists in accelerating wound healing is limited by its poor solubility in aqueous solutions at neutral pH. Th e proposed research aims at developing novel TGF-a antagonists with excellent solubility, potent activity and high wound-penetration activity, based on the current chemical forms of TGF-a peptantagonists. The new forms of TGF-a peptantagonists developed in these studies should be excellent candidate drugs for treating diabetic foot ulcers. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE the goal of this project is to develop therapeutic agents for diabetic foot ulcers which currently lack effective treatments. The novel antagonist s developed in this project should be ideal drug candidates for treating diabetic foot ulcers in humans.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

6 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2006–2016). Reported award amounts total $2,066,429. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.