SBIR/STTR Research Award

Conformal Sealant for Burn Wound Repair

Award identifier 15a684282d34b043b4f99d192995987e42392d6c9efea6c6a66ec3a89fb82df4Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$185,180

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2010

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Endomedix, Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
DKP6MYX4J176
Solicitation number
PHS2010-2
Topic code
NIMHD

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Deep partial thickness burns involve the deeper layers of the dermis, and usually do not heal for at least 2 to 3 weeks. This often results in significant scarring and contractures, especially in children. There is no established standard treatment for deep partial thickness burns. In general, they may be covered with an occlusive dressing or a topical antimicrobial (e.g., Silvadene or bacitracin) cream and an absorptive dressing; evidently, these are all applied on an ad hoc basis and none of them promotes healing. The unmet challenge of burn treatment is to devise a remedy that prevents infection, speeds healing and reduces scarring. In this project, we will formulate a formable/conformable antibacterial tissue sealant dressing specific for treating burn wounds. In parallel, we will validate the lack of cytotoxicity potential of each tissue sealant formulation using model cell types that the hydrogel will most likely be in close contact upon deployment, to be followed by in vivo biocompatibility testing. The anti-bacterial activities will also be tested, to be followed by an in vivo efficacy validation study in porcine dermal burns. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Burns are one of the most common causes of injury in all age groups. The primary goals of acute burn wound management are prevention of infection and the promotion of optimal wound closure by re-epithelialization to minimize aesthetic and functional impairment. Deep partial thickness burns involve the deeper layers of the dermis, and usually do not heal for at least 2 to 3 weeks. This often results in significant scarring and contractures, especially in children. There is no established standard treatment for deep partial thickness burns. In general, these burns may be covered with an occlusive dressing or a topical antimicrobial (e.g., Silvadene or bacitracin) cream and an absorptive dressing; evidently, these are all applied on an ad hoc basis and none of them promotes healing. The unmet challenge of burn treatment is to devise a remedy that prevents infection, speeds healing and reduces scarring. It is our intention to develop an antibacterial tissue sealant capable of sealing the burn wound, preventing infection, accelerating wound healing and reducing scarring.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

14 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1995–2014). Reported award amounts total $5,483,219. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.