SBIR/STTR Research Award

Reduction of Embodied Carbon in Concrete via Strength Enhancing Biochar-derived Graphene Products

Award identifier b37c00ebd6db678f09f534ff2ec43a45d4fd655c8bda5474b679ea977ff85b55Awarding agency Environmental Protection Agency

Award amount

$100,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Environmental Protection Agency
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ACADIAN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC
Proposal award date
2024-12-16
Contract end date
2025-06-15
UEI
Y3M9AQF9LKJ4
Solicitation number
68HERC24R0185
Topic code
4C

Research abstract

As the most widely used human-made substance on the planet, concrete is a significant producer of CO2. Production of Portland cement, a major component of concrete, produces large amounts of CO2 and is the reason the concrete industry contributes 8% of global CO2 emissions. These emissions result in high embodied carbon for construction projects. A potential route to lowering embodied carbon is to reduce the overall amount of concrete needed for projects by improving its strength. A promising method for increasing concrete strength is the addition of graphene oxide materials, which have been proven as strength enhancers even at concentrations as low as 0.05 wt% of cement. The chemistry of graphene oxide improves cement hydration, and selected morphology can improve structural characteristics within the cement matrix. In the U.S. alone, a 20% reduction in concrete usage would equate to 13.4 million metric tons of CO2 avoided annually, but the barrier against widespread adoption of graphene oxide to achieve this has historically been cost. Graphene oxide is typically a high-cost product, used in specialized applications and in small volumes. It is often produced using graphite, which has no domestic production, and is made using an expensive process and multiple harsh reagents. This project will utilize a patented, low-cost method to produce graphene oxide products from biochar, which is produced from wood waste, a plentiful and renewable resource that is also a carbon sink. The process uses a single reagent to convert chars to graphene oxide products. In addition, the reagent is more environmentally friendly and has high recoverability and recyclability. Previous results showed significant gain in compressive strength of 16.4%, and this project will develop these additives further to improve both compressive and flexural strength. The concrete market is vast with a global value of over $617 billion and it is predicted to surpass $972 billion by 2030 which offers enormous commercial potential. When the aforementioned technologies are assembled in this project, the result will be demonstration of a low-cost concrete additive, derived from renewable resources, which can add strength, reduce overall material requirements, and lower embodied carbon in construction projects.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

6 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2020–2025). Reported award amounts total $1,524,662. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Agriculture, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Environmental Protection Agency

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.