SBIR/STTR Research Award

Cough collection as a replacement for sputum samples for diagnosing Tuberculosis

Award identifier 39488e6e6ac8b5092a25aa54a702d3d96e9b72784d3c1aea658b6811779d16ddAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$596,721

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2012

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
DETON CORP
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PA10-123
Topic code
NIAID

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Active Tuberculosis (TB) causes approximately 2 million annual deaths. An estimated 9.3 million people worldwide develop TB every year, of which 4.4 million are undiagnosed. When diagnosed properly, most TB cases can be treated. Currently, sputum expectorate is the most common sampling method used for TB diagnosis. Sputum is difficult to collect from some patients (children and elderly), and is unattainable from ex- pectoration deficient patients ( 20% of patients). Sputum is also contaminated by oropharyngeal flora, saliva, mucus, and cell debris which negatively affects the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostics, and lowers their impact on treatment decisions. Deton's device avoids all the disadvantages of sputum samples by collecting air- borne bacteria directly from cough aerosol for subsequent diagnosis. All patients can produce cough; therefore, samples can be collected from the entire patient population, including patients who cannot expectorate sputum. Furthermore, the cough collection concentrates bacteria in a small sample volume of buffer that supports the viability of fragile organisms; whereas, sputum concentration (fixed number of cells per mL) and medium cannot be altered. Finally, the collected cough droplet material is potentially free of the various oropharyngeal contaminants in sputum. The Phase I aims of the proposed work are: Aim 1: Investigate whether collected cough samples result in higher diagnostic sensitivity and specificity than sputum samples. Aim 2: Improve the device geometry to maximize collection efficiency and machine the new design for lab and clinical evaluations. Phase I aims will enable the testing of the device for different lung infections such as non-tuberculosis mycobacterial infections and community acquired pneumonia in Phase II. Furthermore, a more patient-friendly disposable device can be manufactured based on the second prototype and the patient data. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Among infectious diseases, active tuberculosis (TB) is the second leading cause of death worldwide ( 2 million/year) with 9.3 million people worldwide developing TB every year. Most current TB diagnostic methods rely on sputum samples and suffer from the its disadvantages such as oral flora contamination and inability of some patients to produce sputum. The proposed work studies the feasibility of replacing sputum samples by collecting cough droplets from patients using a novel device.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.