SBIR/STTR Research Award

Readiness Assessment and Training Evaluation System (RATES) for Aviation Maintenance

Award identifier 9920c7ad261c9fc322bfb8eb48fafd3fb35b7062d0b0d9d31c8a1323316562bbAwarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$99,963

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
SYS
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
FLLRPTP8S7N4
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Poor availability of training equipment for aviation maintenance training centers due to mock up malfunctions or out-of-date equipment can compromise Naval readiness. The purpose of this project is to devise an assessment methodology. The objective is toprovide an assessment system and process that measures training technologies such as hardware, simulation, advanced distance learning, advanced technology approaches, etc. as they relate to aviation maintenance Naval training requirements and high-leveltraining and readiness goals. A second objective of this project is to investigate the process of continually assessing all training technology implementation as an effective means of delivering training to the sailor while ashore or afloat. The processof establishing an assessment framework for aviation training technologies will prove effective. The assessment is based on a framework of Navy readiness and training goals. The entire assessment framework will be available to Naval trainingdecision-makers on an interactive Web site in a client/server format that allows distributed and asynchronous assessment visualization into the future. Fundamental payoffs for training system performance measurement, that is using RATES, will be realizedfrom quantifying impact to aviation maintenance readiness from training equipment non-availability or out-of-configuration status and assessment results that define levels of impact to readiness based on categories of training equipment, i.e. trainingdevices for aviation electronic technicians, aviation ordnanceman, aviation boatswain's mate, etc. In addition RATES will Identify an effective training approaches, such as, the trade off of use of Technical Training Equipment (TTE) hardware versesadvanced technology-based approaches to training aviation maintenance sailors. This will include an Instructional Media Matrix that cross-references the different training in terms of types of equipment, devices, and documents. Also, documented andperhaps most importantly, assessment that can be used as justification for funding of training devices development, spare parts, hardware/software updates and adequate levels of maintenance on these devices and the ability to prioritize scarce resourcesbased on readiness contribution.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

3 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2003–2004). Reported award amounts total $2,291,916. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Contractor profile

KRATOS TECHNOLOGY & TRAINING SOLUTIONS, INC.

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.