SBIR/STTR Research Award

Electromagnetic Bougienage for Esophageal Atresia

Award identifier e988b4c4d2cd04f79b8942adb6335d7f8fb2e86ed7de2c71c0bbf613a96a102cAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$197,515

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2005

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Magplane Technology, Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
PHS2005-2
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): In esophageal atresia (EA) the esophagus is malformed so that its distal and proximal segments each end in a pouch and fail to bridge the connection from the mouth to the stomach. It is characterized by incomplete formation of the tubular esophagus and/or an abnormal connection between the esophagus and trachea. EA is the most common congenital malformation of the esophagus (one per 3000 births; approx. incidence of 1300/yr in the United States). When the two esophageal segments are sufficiently close they can be joined by anastomosis without tension (90% of cases). However, for approximately 100 babies/yr in the United States (7.5% of cases] the two ends of the esophagus are too widely separated for this remedy. If the ends were to be joined they would be under too much tension to endure. For these cases the most common procedure is to interpose a segment of colon to bridge the distance. This is an extremely arduous procedure for the child and has significant continuing care consequences. Hendren and Hale in 1975 described a procedure based on electromagnetic bougienage (stretching) to lengthen the esophageal segments. Ferromagnetic metal bougies were placed in the two ends of the esophagus. An electromagnetic field was placed over the chest of the infant. Then alternating applications of current through the electromagnetic device was used to magnetize and draw the bougies together over a 30-day period. In the four trial cases the ends of the esophagus were seen to become elongated and thickened allowing successful primary repair. Nursing resistance to the protracted immobilization of the infants in the crude equipment discouraged further development at that time, but in 2004 is strongly supported by nursing. We propose a next generation device for electromagnetic bougienage that will meet modern hospital standards for safety and ease of use. In the proposed device the progress of the tissue stretch will be monitored by ultrasound imaging systems. The specific aims of this Phase I proposal: (1) to fabricate an operational prototype Electro-Magnetic Bougienage Nursing Station (EMBNS), (2) to demonstrate safety criteria appropriate to in-hospital use and (3) to carry out clinical trials on two or more infants. A Phase II proposal will be submitted to develop "smart" bougie bullets that will continuously monitor the distance between the bullets, to continue clinical trials and to explore additional related application of the EM bougienage technique. Our overall goal is a treatment that will result in shorter hospitalization, better clinical outcomes and a higher quality of life for the patient.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.