SBIR/STTR Research Award

Enhancing Healthcare Delivery and Patient Outcomes: Noninvasive Wireless Sensors to Improve Ventricular Shunt Monitoring, Reduce Imaging, and Alleviate the Burden on Providers, Patients, and Families

Award identifier 498d774179d100ed72a61a221b37e9f9cdb3b8a70f715114cac3ae3d49d7275bAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$966,022

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
RHAEOS, INC
Proposal award date
2024-12-09
Contract end date
2027-11-30
UEI
M7AZFQWPZJ65
Solicitation number
PAR21-265
Topic code
NINDS

Research abstract

ABSTRACT Hydrocephalus is a common and costly neurological condition caused by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) buildup in the ventricles of the brain. It affects >1 million American and occurs in 1-5 of every 1,000 live births worldwide. While there is no cure for hydrocephalus, it is typically treated via the surgical implantation of a shunt, a pressure-regulated tube that drains excess CSF away from the ventricles to a distal absorptive site, most often the peritoneal cavity. Unfortunately, shunts are highly failure prone, with >50% of shunt recipients requiring surgical revision or replacement within a decade of implantation. Indeed, surgeries related to hydrocephalus are the most common neurosurgical procedures performed in children. More challenging, however, is the nature of shunt malfunctions: early symptoms are clinically non-specific and include headaches, nausea, and fatigue. As a result, accurately diagnosing shunt malfunction is difficult and regularly leads to unnecessary emergency department (ED) visits, frequent invasive testing, and a significant mental and physical burden for patients and their families. Moreover, long-term surveillance of implanted shunts currently requires routine imaging and creates a significant healthcare cost burden for patients and families. FlowSense, a flexible, wearable medical device, allows for a non-invasive, radiation-free, reliable, and fast assessment of CSF flow in under 10 minutes by utilizing the principle of thermal anisotropy. The flow information gathered by the device aims to be highly clinically useful as an aid to shunt malfunction diagnosis. The proposed work in this grant follows the successful completion of Phase I (Feasibility, Technical Development) and Phase II (Regulatory, Clinical Safety and Effectiveness) work. We aim to drive clinical adoption of FlowSense by improving device manufacturability and establishing clinical utility in both the ED and outpatient setting with the goal of improving clinical workflow, reducing unnecessary and time-consuming diagnostic testing, and decreasing the disease burden on patients and families.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

7 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2020–2025). Reported award amounts total $6,834,714. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.