SBIR/STTR Research Award

Fast Detection of Electrical Faults in Shipboard Electrical Power Distribution Systems

Award identifier 816369f7594b1daf12f97102fb249c80d71f2caf8b104344b665fbae594c13b6Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$70,000

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2003

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
WILLIAMSRDM, INC.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Z28BFD9MEYL8
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

Williams-Pyro, Inc. proposes to develop a wire fault location system using fault detection and location algorithms that will detect the presence of electrical faults from applications in grounded, medium-voltage shipboard electric plants with high harmoniccontent and generate electrical data to allow coordinated identification of fault locations. Using new algorithms for signal reflectometry with a software response system, SWIFT will detect faults in all forms of power distribution cable within a ship,including co-axial transmission lines, twin-ax transmission lines, and single-conductor wire bundles. Using Open Systems Architecture methodology, SWIFT will integrate sophisticated circuitry for fault detection and location and a software response systemthat reacts to the presence of a fault and alerts the crew to any damage to insulation and identifies its severity and location. The market for the proposed SWIFT system comprises all ships: 270 in the Navy, 232 cutters in the Coast Guard, 206 cruiseships worldwide by 2004, and 20,870 merchant ships worldwide. According to Lloyd's Register World Fleet Statistics, in 2000 the world fleet was 87,716. The future of this already large market is promising. According to Ocean Shipping Consultants Ltd., thetotal world fleet is expected to continue to grow: 40 percent expansion over the next 15 years. Williams-Pyro, Inc. is well prepared to take advantage of these opportunities by successfully transitioning SWIFT from idea to profitable product. Followingtechnology development, WPI will commercialize SWIFT using our product-development process. The first step is to host a product demonstration at WPI's in-house laboratory for the Navy acquisition community and design agents/shipbuilders, such as NorthropGrumman. Our relationship with Northrop Grumman Ship Systems will enable WPI to develop a product to integrate easily aboard the DD(X) and CVN(X) currently under design. Second, our system will undergo testing in a Navy lab and then aboard the ex-USSShadwell. The third step will involve extensive field-testing. Fourth, WPI's marketing department will investigate alternative product applications. The final step is full production and product launch.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

71 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1999–2014). Reported award amounts total $15,259,111. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Commerce, Department of Homeland Security, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.