SBIR/STTR Research Award

Commercialization of Graphical Display for Critical Care Environments

Award identifier 8233de73cd12bf38895108d117bf75d0ed2f9e7e6aa017e0f0f53fb209caacc2Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$358,124

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2007

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
APPLIED MEDICAL VISUALIZATIONS, LLC
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
Not reported
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The objective of this project is to develop and test information visualization display technology that will aid clinicians in diagnosing and treating unexpected events in critical care environments. Unexpected events occur frequently in the ICU and many are related to missing, inaccurate or misinterpreted information. In a one year study of 1024 patients in an ICU, 241 human errors extended the stay in the ICU by 425 patient days and consumed 15% of the ICU's resources. Critical care clinicians discover critical events earlier and diagnose the events more accurately when data is presented in a graphic display. Preliminary studies found that when a graphic display of arterial blood gas information was used, the visual ABG display was more effective in communicating the status of the pH, PaCo2 and HCO3-values to the user, thus significantly increasing the situational awareness of the user. In addition, the display significantly increased the accuracy of the diagnosis while reducing cognitive workload. Our research plan is to build upon the successful results in phase 1 and extend the display to include more variables to give the clinicians a holistic understanding of the patients gas exchange state. Data-driven visual metaphors will be refined through an iterative design process. Usability testing will guide design enhancements. The resulting display will be implemented in C++ programming language. The utility of the graphic display will be measured using both a realistic patient simulator and a clinical ICU study. Thirty critical care clinicians will be called into a simulated ICU to assess the status of a patient in 4 different scenarios. Performance of the participants in the simulation will be evaluated based on the time to detect a given event, formulate a correct diagnosis, and provide effective supportive care. During the clinical evaluation we will place the new display in the ICU room and observe and record clinician's interventions and actions. Expert evaluators will rank order the performance of the clinicians both with the display and without. In addition, we will use a series of subjective instruments to ascertain information about desirability, perceived effectiveness and utility. This proposed display system has the ability to significantly increase patient safety by reducing the number of errors associated with misinterpretation of this information. In addition, it is anticipated that the new visualization system will have educational impact, as it will provide a clear demonstration and interaction of variables to both novices and experts alike.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.