SBIR/STTR Research Award

SBIR Phase I: Personal Safety Monitor - Low Cost Carbon Monoxide Detection with Nanotube Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems Device

Award identifier 5eb2d1b5f03ac54e36abcf17c45ffa3d7c17cc9e424d666b89c697edaf712ae6Awarding agency National Science Foundation

Award amount

$99,991

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2006

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Science Foundation
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Nanomix, Inc.
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
ZDZFVAN3JAU5
Solicitation number
NSF 05-557
Topic code
EL

Research abstract

This Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Phase I project will expand the field of carbon nanotube transistors applicability and provide a much needed safety improvement tool. The proposed work will address the feasibility issues associated with the detection of carbon monoxide. Innovative research is required (1) in the development of recognition layers required to make a specific sensor; and (2) in the integration of carbon nanotube based platform onto a MEMS. For this first point, several different specific recognition layers for CO will be deposited on the nanotube device. These will be tested for their specific response to CO in varying temperature and humidity conditions as well as against cross reactants. Following device characterization and determination of the optimal working temperature, the end product of Phase I will be twofold, with (1) a working lab prototype for CO detection; and, (2) a 100mm wafer of functional MEMS. There is an identified need to monitor firefighters' exposure to CO, as they regularly encounter the poison when in the field, a situation that can significantly impaired their capacities, both physical and intellectual, therefore putting their life at risk. The proposed low cost device could easily integrate and calculate the built up of carbon monoxide in the blood, triggering an alarm when maximum permissible exposure is reached. In addition, the device would store this information into an integrated memory to build a profile for each individual firefighter. Other population have been identified that could significantly benefit from personal carbon monoxide monitoring. The total unmet need here is therefore in the order of 1.4 million people. Unfortunately, the price sensitivity of the personal safety and first response market has thus far prevented the application of widespread individual monitoring of carbon monoxide in the field, forcing people to take significant risks to achieve their duty. The proposed device will provide a solution that offers the technical aptitude of expensive technologies while retaining the ease of use and price consideration of most crude, colorimetric options. The low price target of the product is very attractive to the budgets of municipalities and fire departments.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

7 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2003–2006). Reported award amounts total $1,436,017. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: National Science Foundation, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

National Science Foundation

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.