SBIR/STTR Research Award

Intelligent Controller for Clinical Science Experiments

Award identifier 8facf8531810bba13e4afe0e41929a39c427476f76b6eb04370472fc60f25597Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services

Award amount

$50,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

1993

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
NOVA SCIENTIFIC INCORPORATED
Proposal award date
Not reported
Contract end date
Not reported
UEI
XZHZG8FM18S3
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
Not reported

Research abstract

We will perform proof-of-concept research on a Real-Time Expert System that will entail several parts: 1) capture data from the computer that presently controls a clinical laboratory's testing or research ; 2) perform sophisticated analyses of incoming results; 3) make routine test or experiment control decisions of the sort presently made by the clinician-scientist, basing them on the clinician's priorities, reasoning methods, statistical criteria and rules of thumb, all of which are encoded in the expert system's knowledge base as a hierarchical set of interdependent hypotheses; 4) either directly command the present control computer to implement its decisions, allowing the clinician or technician to manipulate priorities and high level control variables to influence the testing or research protocol; or 5) convey recommendations to the clinician or technician, so she/he may make the ultimate decisions. We expect that our intelligent controller will autonomously determine when statistically valid results have been accumulated, recognize and repeat defective or failed measurements, appropriately alter experiment or test parameters and protocol depending on accumulated results, and in the case of clinical research, recognize unexpected opportunities and adjust protocol to take advantage of them. Our aims in Phase I are to demonstrate feasibility of our product by modifying the knowledge base of our prototype intelligent controller to receive data over a network connection to a laboratory computer at Mass Eye and Ear Infirmary and render experiment-control recommendations concerning a particular auditory neurophysiology experiment. We will evaluate our distributed-computing control concept, evaluate the quality and timeliness of experiment control recommendations, identify modifications of architecture to facilitate our Phase II research, and identify software tools that we must construct to facilitate our Phase III efforts. Our system should improve experiment or test flow decisions by increasing the sophistication of analysis on which they are based; it should improve productivity and cost-effectiveness of clinical research that is amenable to computer control.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

40 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1993–2019). Reported award amounts total $12,777,155. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Commerce, Department of Homeland Security, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.